Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke

Also;

https://c19ivermectin.com/

https://c19hcq.com/

The blacklisting of these treatments by medical, political, and media elites was and is downright EVIL.


14 posted on 07/03/2021 5:43:56 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman

Those are links to Front Line Critical Care Alliance.

Here’s another link that gives a different perspective on FLCCA.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90552
From the article:

‘This is Real’

“Marik and Kory say they’re frustrated that their work is now being championed by the political right, and that it’s become politicized at all. The group has had to distinguish itself from America’s Frontline Doctors, which gained notoriety for its pro-hydroxychloroquine, anti-lockdown rhetoric last summer.”

“”This is not a political issue and it should never be,” Marik said. “We are driven by the science and the data, not by politics or anything else.””

“”It angers me, when I hear that it’s a conspiracy, that this virus doesn’t exist, that there aren’t that many deaths,” he added. “You have to come to the ICU and see that people are dying to realize this is no hoax, this is real.””

“Marik finds it particularly disappointing that his work has been misinterpreted as potentially undermining vaccination.”

“”That’s complete nonsense,” he said. “I was vaccinated yesterday and I believe this is a bridge to vaccination,” noting that slow vaccine roll-outs, vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine quality will likely mean the world will be dealing with COVID-19 for a long time to come.”

Some comments on their methodology:

“Zain Chagla, MD, an infectious diseases physician at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, reviewed each of the trials in Hill’s review in a Twitter thread. He called the overall evidence “very low grade” and was also unhappy that Hill disseminated it as a video.”

“”We always want to see these things published, rather than me walking through a video, pulling these studies myself,” Chagla told MedPage Today.”

“He said if there was indeed a signal for efficacy, he would have expected ivermectin to be rolled into the SOLIDARITY or RECOVERY study by now.”

“”I want it to work, but at the same time, this whole thing feels like déjà vu of the first two months of the pandemic when we weren’t decided about hydroxychloroquine,” Chagla said. “We don’t want to come around a year later saying it didn’t help and it may have hurt.””

You’ll note these FLCCA doctors do not consider ivermectin a substitute for the vaccines but mostly as a stop-gap until the vaccines are available which BTW, the vaccines are now widely available so there is no need for stop-gaps.


15 posted on 07/03/2021 7:48:30 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson