Posted on 07/02/2021 2:59:39 PM PDT by BeauBo
(President Trump's Operation Warp Speed Update)
(Over 2/3rds of American Adults now have at least a first shot - 88.2% of those 65+ - Vaccinations slow on this report - Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths remain low, but may be starting to bend upward a bit)
Total Vaccine Doses Delivered: 382,636,520 (21,434,300 J&J)
Administered: 328,809,470 (12,510,528 J&J)
People Vaccinated, At Least One Dose: 181,650,678
Fully Vaccinated: 156,255,896
(Excerpt) Read more at covid.cdc.gov ...
Total Vaccine Doses Delivered: 353,000 (Weak) (Still No J&J - well over a week)
Administered: 657,000 (Weak) (41,000 J&J - Weak)
People Vaccinated, First Shot: 312,000 (A bit Weak).
Fully Vaccinated: 371,000 (Weak)
% Total Population with at least a First Shot: 54.7 (up 0.1)
Those ≥ 18 Years of Age (Adults): 66.8% (up 0.1)
Those ≥ 65 Years of Age: 88.2 % (flat) (78.4% Fully Vaccinated - up 0.1)
Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths still low, with a flat, but a slight upward bend might be starting.
316 Deaths (low - flat trend)
VAERS COVID Vaccine Data
(Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, USA)
411,931 Reports
Through June 25, 2021
6,985 DEATHS
23,257 HOSPITALIZATIONS
54,606 URGENT CARE
77,821 OFFICE VISITS
1,775 ANAPHYLAXIS
2,081 BELL’S PALSY
775 Miscarriages
2,757 Heart Attacks
1,930 Myocarditis/Pericarditis
1,908 Thrombocytopenia/Low Platelet
6,899 Life Threatening
18,270 Severe Allergic Reaction
5,852 Disabled
4,869 Tinnitus
The CDC and FDA SHOULD have been looking instead of deep-sixing the records.
NOTA BENE: The Official DID NOT intend for his slide to be made public.
He was not able to access his other computer and a third party was advancing the slides for his presentation.
At 2:33:40 he accidentally lets it flash on the screen; only visible for less than a second.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
“calling myocarditis mild reminds me of the saying about minor surgery. Minor surgery is surgery on someone else; mild myocarditis is something that happens to other folks’ kids.
Humans have only one heart; inflaming it at a young age is not a small thing. University of Michigan cardiologist Venk Murthy, MD, a specialist in imaging, rebutted the “mild” framing with comments on Twitter: “people with myocarditis are usually counseled to limit activity, placed on 1 or more meds and are at lifetime increased risk of cardiac complications. This can have profound consequences.”
As an electrophysiologist, I see the complications of myocarditis: heart failure and ventricular arrythmia due to scar. Availability bias notwithstanding, heart rhythm doctors feel the asymmetry of myocarditis risk. Although it is true that most myocarditis resolves without issue, it is also true that sometimes it does not.
...Regular people are not emotionless robots who decide using odds ratios. Most people do not calculate risk, they feel risk. People have special circumstances and make judgments relative to their benefit-harm situation. To persuade people with charts and statistics belies an understanding of clinical practice.
For example, let’s say the parents (or grandparents) of a teenager have pre-existing conditions. These special circumstances tip the balance, and the parents decide to vaccinate the adolescent. Contrast that with, say, young parents who have no risk factors. This family feels less risk from the virus, and they might feel more regret if their child developed myocarditis. They want to see more data before making the decision. Both scenarios depict rational decision-making. It’s how medical decisions should be made: with judgment and benefit-harm balances and considerations of special circumstances. “
Another factor that needs to be considered is what is the relative risk of myocarditis in COVID cases both symptomatic and asymptomatic among the affected age groups.
If myocarditis is being observed because of a controlled introduction of the coronavirus spike protein by vaccination, what is the risk of myocarditis of uncontrolled viral replication via infection?
Seems there is scant study of this.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32387246/
The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA gene-edited vaccine has resulted in the largest number of fatalities: Total reactions for its mRNA vaccine Tozinameran: 5,961 deaths and 452,779 injuries to 22/05/2021 While Pfizer has the largest numbers of deaths and injuries, the EU Commission has largely placed the blame on AstraZeneka. Ironically, not only does Pfizer have a criminal record with the US Department of Justice for “fraudulent marketing”, the EU Commission has chosen Pfizer BioNTech as its “Reliable Partner” for the production of 1.8 billion doses over the next 3-4 years, in a contract which is currently under negotiation. Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, May 27, 2021 Two months ago, we tried to alert people to the paradoxical results of the covid19 vaccines by publishing the pre- and post-vaccination mortality curves for Israel and Great Britain [1] which already showed that these vaccinations were followed by ‘a considerable increase in contamination and mortality lasting 6 to 8 weeks after the start of vaccination. [2]
Learn more about RevenueStripe... Since this period, vaccination campaigns have spread worldwide even to countries where covid was not present. And everywhere they have been followed by a dramatic rise in new infections and mortality for several weeks or months. [3] How many deaths and severe accidents will it take for executives, WHO, health agencies FDA, EMA among others, to look at the proven results of this experimental pseudo-vaccination in the real world and derive the results from it? consequences ? Reminder of the proven facts published by the WHO We present below the epidemic curves of the most vaccinated countries as published by the WHO (with our comments in red).
ASIA In Nepal, a country of 28 million inhabitants The vaccination campaign, using the Chinese vaccine and the Indian Astra Zeneca, began at the end of January 2021. So far, after ten months of the epidemic, the country had 270,092 confirmed cases and 2017 deaths and the daily average of new cases s ‘amounted to 350. Four months after vaccination began, the epidemic has exploded with a current average of 8,000 new cases daily. As of May 22, Nepal had 497,052 (+ 90%) confirmed cases and 6,024 deaths (+ 200%.)
In Thailand, a country of 70 million inhabitants The vaccination campaign using the Chinese vaccine began in the first week of March. So far, since the start of the epidemic, the country has only recorded 25,000 infected and 83 deaths attributed to Covid19. Since the start of vaccination, in 2 months, the number of infected has multiplied by 5 (123,066 on 22/5) and that of deaths by 9 (735 on 22/5).
In Cambodia, a country of 27 million inhabitants In Mongolia, a country of 3.3 million inhabitants
South America In Colombia , a country of 50 million inhabitants country severely affected by the disease, the epidemic began to decline sharply until the start of the vaccination campaign on February 18, 2021.
Since then, the number of daily infections has quadrupled and daily mortality has multiplied by 3 Chile, country of 18 million inhabitants Vaccination began on December 24 and a total of nearly 17.1 million doses of the vaccine have been administered to less than 20 million people. But despite the highest vaccination coverage rate in South America and harsh confinements, the number of daily infections and the number of deaths remain close to triple what they were before the start of the vaccination campaign …
In Brazil, a country of 217 million inhabitants Vaccination began on January 18 as weekly mortality stabilized around 7,000 Middle East
In the United Arab Emirates, a country of 10.5 million inhabitants In Kuwait, a country of 4.2 million inhabitants
EUROPE
In Hungary, a country of 9.8 million inhabitants The vaccination campaign, which began at the end of February, was followed by a sharp increase in weekly contaminations, which rose from 25,576 on February 25 to 62,265 a month later, before gradually falling back to the pre-vaccination level.
In two and a half months, Hungary has doubled its figures of infected (400,000 to 800,000) and deaths (from 14,000 to 29,000) reached after 11 months of epidemic In Romania, a country of 20 million inhabitants The vaccination campaign began at the end of December at a time when the epidemic was waning, and according to official data from May 4, 21 Bucharest has the highest vaccination rate in the country with 31.2% of its eligible population vaccinated. . But shortly after the start of vaccination, the number of daily infections and mortality increased. Before vaccination after ten months of the epidemic, Romania had 618,000 infected and 15,000 dead. After five months of vaccination, she counts twice as much. Monaco, country of 38,000 inhabitants had only 3 deaths before vaccination and 32 since vaccination
Gibraltar, 34,000 inhabitants : vaccination of the entire population was followed by an 800% increase in mortality from 10 to 94) What can be deduced from these official data. Hypotheses The Israeli and British Pyrrhic victories [4] Vaccination advocates claim vaccinations in Israel and Britain have been successful, as current, daily contaminations and mortality are low. But these apparent successes correspond in fact to the disappearance of a large part of the people at risk (the “harvesting ”) achieved by vaccination and to the spontaneous regression of the disease observed also in countries with little vaccination. Vaccine “harvesting” In these two countries, the mortality attributed to Covid increased sharply for 4 to 6 weeks, equaling all the deaths in 2020. The covid per vaccination mortality curve in Israel is demonstrative. The “harvest” of 1,404 people in January and 949 others in February, the equivalent of a full year of Covid mortality without a vaccine (the year 2020) sharply reduced the number of Israelis at risk, resulting in de facto probably a decrease in the apparent risk of mortality in the coming year, in this age group. But along with this decrease in its original target, the virus has mutated to attack other segments of society and especially younger age groups. In November 2020, data from the Israeli Ministry of Health revealed that Israel had detected 400 cases of the coronavirus in children under the age of two. In February 2021, that number increased to 5,800. The same “harvesting ” has been observed in Great Britain. As the Covid19 threatens only a small part of the population (the elderly with comorbidity), the peri-vaccination disappearance of a large part of this population (as much as the deaths of the year 2020) at risk, mathematically reduces mortality observed, at least transiently. Since the British vaccination campaign, the average mortality per million inhabitants in Great Britain (934 / M) is more than double that of the Netherlands (411 / M). The natural regression of the epidemic Also explains the drop in mortality as shown in the comparison between the highly vaccinated Great Britain and the very poorly vaccinated Netherlands The mortality curves per million inhabitants follow the same temporality in these two neighboring countries. That of the United Kingdom suffers from a much higher peri-vaccination peak, the current mortality in the Netherlands is slightly higher reflecting the absence of the English “harvest”. The current vaccination, accelerator of the epidemic and mortality? The review of the main countries which have adopted broad vaccination shows that in real populations, generalized vaccination behaves more as an accelerator of the epidemic and of mortality than as a prevention thereof. [5] In all highly vaccinated countries, the mortality recorded during the two months after vaccination is equal to or exceeds that of the whole of 2020. LACK OF SOLID EXPERIMENTAL DATA The tests of these vaccines were insufficient, without hindsight, because they are in progress. The first results are promised for early 2023. None of them pointed out the possibility of a possible increase in contamination and mortality, which fortunately appear to be transitory. They are not very informative on the more or less serious side effects, such as the frequency of early vascular accidents in the days following vaccination, or the multiplication of miscarriages and menstrual disorders in women for example and of course the possible more complications. late in the medium and long term. The race for accelerated vaccination at all costs could ultimately be ineffective for popular confidence in all vaccinations. There’s no point in running, you have to start on time, La Fontaine would have said. But new billionaires like the CEO of Moderna probably don’t think like the turtle in the Fable who has already amassed a fortune. THE FUTURE IS EARLY TREATMENTS MASTERED BY FIELD PHYSICIANS Transparent studies are essential to understand the mechanism of these transient worsening of the epidemic after vaccination and to deduce possible preventive measures, if a new outbreak occurs. Especially since the future, after this vaccine hecatomb, remains very uncertain. The leaders who have violated the bases of medicine and democracy by imposing express vaccination without respecting the usual procedures for the safety and effectiveness of drugs placed on the market, all find themselves promising their populations early treatment for future waves, thus proving, like Boris Johnson, that they no longer believe in the vaccination they have imposed. [6] MEDICINE SHOULD NOT BE DECIDED BY POLICY Health policy should no longer be imposed or guided by often inaccurate simulations (and their displays sometimes influenced by policies as English scientists admit), but should be based on respect for democracy and clinical experience. field physicians possibly guided by simple non-binding recommendations. All data must be transparent like the figures of the Sentinels Network which reflects the number of real patients, consulting doctors for clinical signs. Much more reliable than the perennial contamination figures based on unreliable PCR tests. The political choice to prohibit the free choice of treatment by the authorities has led in several countries of the world, including France, to numerous deaths, at least part of which was preventable. The ongoing trials will give voice to the families of the victims without repairing the irreparable loss of a loved one. ESSENTIAL MORATORIUM Totalitarianism, systematic censorship and persecution of opponents and the suppression of fundamental freedoms in science, medicine and economics only lead to more or less long-term catastrophes, including for those responsible for them. It is high time to go back to the proven facts and to their critical examination without a priori. In all countries, experimental vaccinations were followed by an increase in contamination and mortality attributed to Covid19 and the appearance of mutants. As long as the phenomenon has not been elucidated, a moratorium on anticovid vaccinations is essential and urgent.
Prominent medical journals highlight harm to children from masks, death risk from COVID vaccines
One journal has already issued an “expression of concern,” however, citing “misrepresentation of the COVID-19 vaccination efforts.”
By Greg Piper
Updated: July 1, 2021 - 10:26pm
Article
Dig In
The range of acceptable opinion on COVID-19 mitigation efforts may be widening, with peer-reviewed medical journals recently publishing research finding that masks likely harm schoolchildren and questioning whether benefits from COVID-19 vaccines outweigh risks.
Measured carbon dioxide content in “inhaled air,” observed in a study of masked German schoolchildren, was at least three-fold higher than German law allows, according to a research letter published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Pediatrics.
Last week, the journal Vaccines, affiliated with the American Society for Virology, published research that estimates every three COVID-19 deaths prevented by vaccination are offset by two deaths “inflicted by vaccination,” using Israeli and European data.
The papers share a lead author, Harald Walach, a professor in Poznan University of the Medical Sciences’ Pediatric Clinic in Poland and University of Witten/Herdecke’s psychology department in Germany.
“Most of the complaints reported by children” in a Germany-wide register on mask-wearing, including irritability, headache and reluctance to go to school, “can be understood as consequences of elevated carbon dioxide levels in inhaled air,” the JAMA Pediatrics paper said. It cited the “dead-space volume of the masks, which collects exhaled carbon dioxide quickly after a short time.”
In light of “impairments attributable to hypercapnia,” or the bloodstream buildup of CO2, policymakers should reconsider requiring children to wear masks, it said.
The study passed muster at the University of Witten/Herdecke’s ethics board, given that it required each child to wear various masks for a total of 15 minutes, in contrast to the “several hours” they spend masked in school, the trial protocol said.
The authors tried out various masks, including KN95 respirators and surgical masks, on 45 healthy children ages 6-17 in southwest Germany. The room was “well ventilated several times” for each experiment, with CO2 content of ambient air kept under 0.1% by volume.
The first 3-minute measurement gauged “baseline” unmasked CO2 levels. The next 3-minute intervals were for CO2 content in “joint inhaled and exhaled air,” inhaled air only and exhaled air only.
Two thousand parts per million of CO2, or 0.2%, is the limit for closed rooms under German law, the study said. The child with the lowest CO2 level was three times higher than this limit, while one 7-year-old was measured with 25,000 parts per million.
‘[D]oes sharing this make me an anti-masker?’
Medical experts quickly debated the JAMA Pediatrics paper and a related question: the paucity of research on whether masks have benefitted schoolchildren since schools started requiring them for in-person learning.
“[D]oes sharing this make me an anti-masker?” Johns Hopkins University epidemiologist Stefan Baral asked Tracy Hoeg, another epidemiologist who co-wrote a January paper on the low risk of COVID spread in schools with masked children.
While she’s a critic of masking schoolchildren, Hoeg responded that the study didn’t provide “the implications of these CO2 levels” or include an “unmasked baseline group by age,” and questioned why JAMA Pediatrics published it.
The better question is why studies used to promote masking don’t have a control group, and why the effects of “all-day mask wearing” remain unstudied, countered Jennifer Cabrera. She helped coordinate a group of Florida parents to get their children’s school-required masks tested at a University of Florida lab, which found multiple strains of dangerous bacteria on them.
“1 year later and no one has shown that asking kids to wear masks works!” tweeted Vinay Prasad, University of California San Francisco epidemiologist and Baral’s coauthor on a paper arguing against emergency use authorization for child-focused COVID vaccines.
“US CDC recommends masking from 2 years to 5 years — they need to do a trial to prove it. I bet it will fail,” Prasad wrote.
Tweet URL
The paper in Vaccines calculated the “number needed to vaccinate” (NNTV) to prevent one COVID-19 death, using a million-person Israeli field study and “the most prominent trial data from regulatory phase 3 trials.”
Because European side-effect reports vary widely due to different national reporting standards, the researchers used the Dutch national register of “individual case safety reports” — the highest in Europe — to gauge the number of severe and fatal side effects per 100,000 vaccinations.
They gauged that 16 cases per 100,000 vaccinations will develop “severe adverse reactions” and four people will die, which “tallies well” with the 3.4 deaths per 100,000 found in a recent analysis of the U.S. adverse reactions reporting system.
“Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths,” according to the paper, though looking at phase 3 trial data alone, the “optimum case” is four deaths caused and 33 lives saved by vaccines.
“However, one should consider the simple legal fact that a death associated with a vaccination is different in kind and legal status from a death suffered as a consequence of an incidental infection,” the paper said.
The Vaccines paper “is an excellent and much needed analysis,” Jane Orient, executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, told Just the News. She thinks the risk-benefit ratio is likely to be “much worse” than the paper’s authors estimate, however, “with lives lost to vaccines much greater and lives saved less.”
It didn’t take long for Vaccines to have doubts about publishing Walach’s paper, however. The journal posted an “expression of concern” four days later, specifically questioning the claimed ratio of lives saved to deaths caused.
“Serious concerns have been raised about misinterpretation of the data and the conclusions,” it reads, citing the paper’s “misrepresentation of the COVID-19 vaccination efforts and misrepresentation of the data.” The journal has notified the authors and “will provide an update following the conclusion of our investigation.”
Brown University epidemiologist Andrew Bostom mocked the journal’s about-face. He asked rhetorically whether a similar investigation would commence into “deaths unrelated to ‘severe acute respiratory syndrome’” that were attributed to COVID-19.
“Population ≥ 12 Years of Age
181,429,637
64%”
Pretty good so far. Those numbers might go up quite a bit before school starts.
First reasonable study I’ve come across that showed a benefit from masking.
Still have my doubts from real world figures but...
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7027e1.htm
“These findings suggest that portable HEPA air cleaners can reduce exposure to SARS-CoV-2 aerosols in indoor environments, with greater reductions in exposure occurring when used in combination with universal masking....
The face masks used on the headforms were three-ply cotton cloth face masks with ear loops (Defender, HanesBrands Inc.)....0.3 μm to 3 μm aerosol particles”
LOL!
Did you report to VAERS that since getting the vaccine you’re followed by crazy women?
Still waiting on definitive news from UK on Delta...
Referring you to the link in my reply 12.
See anything grossly wrong with it?
I’m not a fan of masking but try to be fair on data.
Started vaccinating 10Jan, finished on 18Mar. Deaths came as vaccination was just starting https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/gibraltar/ Is there a correlation? Possibly. But your wording is clearly incorrect. The cases that led to those deaths peaked a couple days before vaccinations started.
The UK vaccinations: https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&pickerSort=desc&pickerMetric=total_vaccinations&Metric=People+vaccinated&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=true&Align+outbreaks=false&country=~GBR The UK deaths: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk/ Lockdowns last summer had the same effect, but this time the country opened up instead.
“Did you report to VAERS that since getting the vaccine you’re followed by crazy women?”
They started following me before I got the vaccine, but I guess I could put it into VAERS anyway. Just in case I can claim a piece of some class action lawsuit later.
Very reasonable points that people can consider.
As evidence builds that vaxxing reduces transmission, I’m willing to consider that fact in decisions on vaxxing those who have VERY little risk of suffering from the virus.
Though still inclined not to vaccinate them without specific reason.
Well, I’m getting my shot next week even though it’s still very inconvenient for us rural folk.
Couple of cute crazy women in my town and you’ve proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that crazy women go nuts for vaxxed men!
“Still waiting on definitive news from UK on Delta...”
There might be an inflection (upward) occurring in US Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths. It could be some random fluctuation, or this might be the Delta wave in the making.
In some States (e.g. Missouri, Utah, Arkansas), as well as in Los Angeles, Delta is already the dominant strain, accounting for over half of new cases. It is now present in all 50 States. The two week reporting period for the National variant mix ends tomorrow (3 July), so hopefully we will soon get an update on the prevalence of Delta Nationwide. I am guessing its now over 25% of the total.
Knowing that Delta is a fast mover, we can expect a Delta wave to rise quicker, and crest quicker.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
