SeekAndFind wrote: “The problem is this silly either/or box we continue to put ourselves in. Why can’t it be a BOTH/AND thing?”
Do you say the same thing to the anti-vaxxers who campaigning to ban the vaccines, that try to make the case that the vaccines are poison, etc.
RE: Do you say the same thing to the anti-vaxxers who campaigning to ban the vaccines, that try to make the case that the vaccines are poison, etc.
Yes I do. My opinion is the vaccine AND Ivermectin/Hydroxychloroquine have their place in the arsenal of weapons against Covid-19.
This does not mean that the adverse effects being experienced by many people ( including death ) should not be taken into consideration. This DOES mean that before we COERCE people into taking the vaccine, we have to inform everyone of the possible side effects on the individual based on the individual’s age and personal health condition.
Millions have been vaccinated and a very small percentage of these have had adverse issues. We need to take these into account, not ban the vaccines outright.
Same principle applies to Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.
The attitude should be — INFORMED CONSENT. *NOT* COERCION.