Link, quotes and my notes on article: Orders of Magnitude Higher Deaths in the Vaccinated: Israel’s Vaccine Data Reveals a Frightening Picture

At the following webpage, the article below was appended to the bottom of the page.

Israeli's were shocked to awaken one day to discover they could not attend school or go to places of work without having proof they had been vaccinated. There was no discussion or warning - the public was simply prohibited from functioning unless it complied. Some in Israeli called it, 'vaccination apartheid' as rules prohibiting many ordinary acts of daily living were set in place.

Haim Yatev and Dr. Seligmann noted a Feb. 11, 2021 article published in Ynet, Israel's most well known paper, appeared confused in its interpretation of data collected for the 5 week time period Israel set aside to administer Pfizer's vaccine to the public. The 5 week time period in question began mid-December during a 'confinement' (quarantine).

Yatev and Seligmann re-interpreted the data to remove confusion, and discovered that, taken at face value, the data suggested the opposite of what the paper had initially asserted [article title: Vaccination efficiency data in Israel, and its rapid effects on the young”]

In particular, their analysis helped reveal that during the Israel's Pfizer vaccination period beginning mid-December and lasting roughly a month, Covid-19 cases did not decrease during 'confinement' as they normally do.

More importantly, numbers of serious, critical and death cases increased during that period that covered at least one month.

Furthermore, from mid-December to mid-February (two months), 2337 among all Israeli 5351 official COVID-deaths occurred.

Their analyses demonstrated that death rates increased by orders of magnitude during vaccine administration, as compared to the unvaccinated and those after completing the vaccination process.

According to the researchers, "Presumably, asymptomatic cases before vaccination, and those infected shortly after the 1st dose, tend to develop graver symptoms than those unvaccinated."

The Ministry of Health's organization of the data presented a picture distinctly different from that which is created by more straightforward analysis, and the authors note this could be because the data was not correctly understood or because health officials wanted to portray a more positive interpretation of vaccine efficacy than would otherwise be possible.

The researchers note a sentence provided by the Ministry of Health was, in particular, not born out by the data. According to the Ministry, " “However, 546 among the dead were such that were not at all vaccinated or got the first vaccination dose within two weeks before their death.” This is a curious error because, clearly, none of the data in the table pertains to unvaccinated people.

The number of Covid-19 patients who received either the first or the second vaccine dose is 43781. Among the total of 660 deaths, 546 received only the first dose.

This table of data demonstrates adverse effects of vaccination, rather than the vaccine efficacy claims made by the writers at Ynet.

Piecing together information revealed in the article, the researchers noted the Ynet article statement “…emerges from the data that among 856 patients above 60 years in serious state hospitalized at this time…” Given the article was written February 11, the authors proposed, for the sake of discussion, that the numbers of hospitalized in serious condition were likely collected, and therefore true, the day before or the same day the article was published, which would be Feb 10 or Feb 11.

The authors compared the Ynet statement about the vaccinated who were ill, "856 patients above 60 years in serious state hospitalized at this time" with the data tracked in the Ministry of Health's control panel ('dash board') which declared there were 1056 serious active cases of Covid on Feb 10 (infographic at link).

Therefore, most serious hospitalized cases on February 10 or at a near date were in fact vaccinated with the first dose or up to two weeks after the second dose.

I will put the rest of their article at the bottom as it requires focus to track their analyses of available data. But here is their conclusions for those seeking quick information:

ransomnote: Prayers up for Haim Yativ and Dr Seligmann, for they will surely come under attack for exposing the truth beneath the PR campaign which is being used to falsely portray Israel as a poster child for draconian, nationwide 'vaccination.'

"However, this is not the last surprise we get from examining the data from the Ministry of Health. We can substract the number of people with the first vaccine dose on January 19 2021 from that on February 10 2021. During these 21 days, 1331881 Israeli citizens got the first dose. The table shows that 568 among these died, hence 0.042% and that 39047 among them became a COVID-19 case, hence 2.9 %. For the 2nd dose we focus on data specific to two weeks after the 2nd vaccination according to the table.

From January 26 to February 10 2021 909102 Israeli citizens got the 2nd vaccine dose. Among these according to the table, 92 died, 0.01%. Hence, during the 5 weeks since the first dose at least 0.05% of first dose recipients died. This death rate relates mainly to a relatively young population whose vaccination stated on January 19, a period during which most vaccinated were below 65. In order to estimate the death rate of those above 65 which were mostly vaccinated before that period we use data reported by the USA-based VAERS,

There we found, see article in English, that the ratio of deaths by those above 65 vs those below 65 is about 4.42 (155/35). Hence the death rate of those above 65 between the first and the second vaccination dose should be until January 19 0.042 (the death rate of those below 65) multiplied by 4.42, resulting in 0.186%, which is close to the 0.2% reported by the Ministry of Health on January 21 2021. This value of 0.2 % death has been mysteriously modified later on by the Ministry of Health and was switched to 0.005 without any explanation, see article in Hebrew. Above considerations show that the death rate data provided first were correct, the updated death rate data might have been intended to suggest lower death rates among the elderly.

The number of COVID-19 deaths among the vaccinated since the start of the vaccination action seems to explain the increased death rates from COVID-19 observed since December 2020. For that purpose, we calculate the products of the number of vaccinated people above age 65 by 0.2 and the number of vaccinated people below 65 by 0.04. This shows that most COVID-19 deaths in that period are for vaccinated people, as shows the table provided by the Ministry of Health at the beginning of February.

During the vaccination action from mid-December until mid-February, 2337 among all 5351 COVID-19 deaths reported for Israel occurred, 43.7%. Among these, since January 19, 1271 COVID-19 deaths were reported for Israel. The table provided by the Ministry of Health on February 10 states 660 COVID-19 deaths among the vaccinated, 51.9% of the deaths for that period. Only 1.3 million Israeli, among 8 million (about 1 in 8, 12.5%), were vaccinated during that period. Accordingly, vaccination promotes deaths because 51.9% of deaths during that period are for the 12.5% vaccinated in that period. In addition the serious and critical cases during that period is more than the reported serious cases, the adverse effect of the vaccination process is most likely worse than what appears from the data at hand.

The deaths among those vaccinated should be added to the numerous AVC and cardiac events reported just after vaccination that are not included among COVID-19 deaths which about double the deaths among those vaccinated, whose numbers remain unknown and which we will try to find in the coming days.

At this point we state that vaccinations caused more deaths than the coronavirus would have during the same period. Among those vaccinated and above 65, 0.2% of those vaccinated died during the 3-week period between doses, hence about 200 among 100000 vaccinated. This is to be compared to the 4.91 dead among 100000 dying from COVID-19 without vaccination, see below. This should not be confused with the COVID-19 0.279 deaths among 100000 reported for those who completed the vaccination process, meaning 2 weeks after the second dose, see below table from the Ynet article.

This scary picture also extends to those below 65, among which, for the 5 weeks during the complete vaccination process 0.05%, meaning 50 among 100000, died. This is to be compared to the 0.19 per 100000 dying from COVID-19 and that are not vaccinated in that age group, as per the above table. Hence the death rate of this age group increased by 260 during this 5-week period of the vaccination process, as compared to their natural COVID-19 death rate.

A simple way to pass these points across relate to the monthly COVID-19 deaths rates since the start of the pandemic and until mid-December, 3014 deaths, hence 3014/9 = 334.9 deaths per month. Monthly death rates since mid-December are 2337/2 = 1168.5 deaths per month, hence 3.5 times greater.

We conclude that the Pfizer vaccines, for the elderly, killed during the 5-week vaccination period about 40 times more people than the disease itself would have killed, and about 260 times more people than the disease among the younger age class. We stress that this is in order to produce a green passport valid at most 6 months, and promote Pfizer sales.

These estimated numbers of deaths from the vaccine are probably much lower than actual numbers as it accounts only for those defined as COVID-19 deaths for that short time period and does not include AVC and cardiac (and other) events resulting from the inflammatory reactions in tens of reports documented on the NAKIM site, which themselves are only the iceberg’s tip, see here.

This does not account for long-term complications described in a criminal complaint filed in December 2020 in France and which was translated to English, see here.

Looking back, this explains why the serious COVID-19 cases increased as vaccination started, and why cases started to decline when vaccination was opened to the young and continue to decline as the vaccination national campaign is losing its momentum.

We hope that this massacre will not include those below 13, as these have an increased adverse reaction rate, including death, to vaccines as shown by multi-decennial data from the VAERS reports in the USA.

We summarise that the pandemic may be predicted for the coming weeks. The decrease in vaccinations and in vaccination age will cause a decrease in serious cases, mainly not because of the protection by the vaccine, but because fewer people will die from the vaccine and other adverse vaccine reactions.

This will be temporary as in a few months we expect to face mid- and long-term adverse effects of the vaccination as ADE (Antibody-dependent Enhancement) and the vaccination-resistant mutants selected by the vaccines. But this should occur after the soon coming elections and the (survivor) voters won’t have another opportunity to express their disappointment at the voting poll.

The webpage hosting the analyses by Seligmann and Yativ includes this comment at the end of the page.

7 Jun 2021 6:19 am
Tapnewsreader says:
Hello,Please read and share the shit out of this.It is from the gov.uk website, and was published by SPI-M-O on the 31st of March. It states on page 10 paragraph 32 of the expected roadmap out of lockdown, that they expect there to be a 3rd wave of infections in August. It also states that they expect 60-70% of the expected hospital admissions and DEATHS to come from those who have had both vaccinations.If this isn’t proof for anybody that the vaccines are intended for genocide then I don’t know what is.Here is the link to the gov.uk published analysis
Research and analysis
SPI-M-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2, 31 March 2021
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/spi-m-o-summary-of-further-modelling-of-easing-restrictions-roadmap-step-2-31-march-2021
LOG IN

The more I read about this mRNA “vaccine”, the more I view this as a depopulation scheme.

So, Bill Gates, proponent of vaccines for population reduction, what are your ties to the Wuhan lab?

this is really hard to follow.

and with statistical articles such as this, the GiGo principle applies.

I think they are saying if the first shot does not kill you, it is unlikely the 2nd one will, unless you are young, but that is very rare ?

I wonder how much mortality in the first round was due to medical errors, or bad batches.

on the other hand, the ‘serious and critical’ numbers are important as well.

This article was badly presented, maybe someone will try to translate better, have better data and add some controls.

I'm not going to pretend to fully understand the data here. So if I'm wrong a gentle correction is welcome.

It appears that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine is what's being called out here. Is that correct?

And, what about the non-mRNA vaccine, aka J&J? Is the same true for it as well?

I greatly appreciate anyone with knowledge to reply.

I greatly appreciate anyone with knowledge to reply
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I don’t have information re graphene in J&J. But the same people who weaponized the mRNA are involved in the J&J and AstraZeneca. They want to harm us and have been lying to get us to take these fake products.

The spike proteins are toxic - doesn’t matter if they are delivered via mRNA or DNA in J&J.

So here's my "concern" in all of this and it's not for me since I have a shortened life span due to a genetic condition:

I had the J&J shot because that is the one that the specialist who treats me for my genetically inherited condition recommended for me. My specialist was emphatic that I not take either of the mRNA vaccines specifically because there was no data on what they would do to someone like me. There was evidence of potential side-effects for the J&J vaccine that my specialist concluded were "minimal" for someone like me.

So I'm not asking for me. I'm asking for those who took the J&J vaccine as to what the potential side-effects are and what it'll do to their long-term longevity.

As for me, I'm coming up on 59. The men in my family don't live past either 57 or 72. I beat 57. At the rate I'm going if I make it to 72 I'll be so blessed it'll be amazing.

I'm more concerned about those coming up behind me who had the J&J shot than anything else.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.