If it was (a conversion), then foundation issues should have been addressed during the rehab prior to the City issuing the final certificate of occupancy.
That is why I asked, and your point about how this may have an effect on criteria for city inspection procedure is illustrated.
Thanks again,
From the link in #42
“The building is in fact on piles, not footings (to clear up some info I’ve been seeing). So if it had ongoing settling as the 90s report indicated that is quite unusual.