Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: aspasia

Not in the SCOTUS decision, it isn’t.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-255_g3bi.pdf

“Hate speech” is actually a pretty nebulous expression in the law, appealing to emotions rather than facts.


34 posted on 06/25/2021 10:38:07 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Do kids in Iceland still play "The Floor Is Lava?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Justice Thomas prescience:

The Court . . . identifies this case as an “example” and “leav[es] for future cases” the job of developing this new common-law doctrine. Ante, at 7–8. But the Court’s foundation is untethered from anything stable, and courts (and schools) will almost certainly be at a loss as to what exactly the Court’s opinion today means.

35 posted on 06/25/2021 10:43:41 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson