You are basing your beliefs on absolute total numbers trumpeted by the assorted Carl Sagans who are in position know what they are saying is false.
—
Really! And who are you to make such an assumption and what is its basis? And who says intelligent life (sic) has to be “life as we know it”? There is just a host of other assumption you made that are not facts, but theories based on other assumptions - rendering your essay to round file level.
What about my post says assumption?
And who says intelligent life (sic) has to be “life as we know it”?
Did you not notice in my first sentence that I limited what I wrote to life as we know it... aka carbon based life.
There is just a host of other assumption you made that are not facts, but theories based on other assumptions - rendering your essay to round file level.
What of what I wrote is not factual? Are you saying our sun is not a type G star? Do you mean I understated the percentage of type G stars in the universe? Are you saying there isn't such a thing as a habitable zone?
Where were the errors? Help all of us out here.