The relevant questions are:
• what’s the odds of getting seriously hurt or killed by the vaccine, versus
• the odds of getting seriously hurt or killed by the virus times the odds that you will get the virus.
•If we wait just a little longer will we have better information on long term effects of the vaccine. And/or long term effects of the virus.
•Will they find ways to mitigate the clotting and cardiovascular damage caused by the vaccine?
How about if you ask those questions compared to ANY OTHER vaccine, in history?
Why does this “vax” get a pass from the VPs?
Find ways to mitigate the blood clotting and cardiovascular damage???
Are you serious? A shot/med to overcome the DAMAGE caused by these dangerous shots? That’s a viable solution, for you?
How about NOT taking the shot for something that is 99% survivable, without the stinking shot?
UNREAL what we’re seeing, to justify these very risky shots, especially HERE!
Because that question isn't relevant to the decision to get vaccinated or not. There is no question this vaccine is more dangerous than most vaccines in history, or all vaccines in common usage today. It just doesn't matter. The question is getting the vaccine a better option than risking getting the virus.
Why does this “vax” get a pass from the VPs?
Because Covid is deadly. It kills 1.6% of people who get it. And it causes harm to a lot more than that. There is not time to wait for the perfectly safe vaccine that may or may not ever exist.
Find ways to mitigate the blood clotting and cardiovascular damage??? Are you serious? A shot/med to overcome the DAMAGE caused by these dangerous shots? That’s a viable solution, for you?
Are you really that dense? Did I say anything about a second shot? I'm talking about ways to prevent the damage in the first place. Perhaps a blood thinner like baby aspirin or tumeric to reduce clotting. And maybe something like the substance in olive oil that Dr. Gundry talks about that provides a protective layer to the cardiovascular system. Things we can do before the shot. Maybe they can find a way to keep the spike protein in the muscle better. Or tweak the vaccine to make it less damaging. Again is the wait worth the risk?
How about NOT taking the shot for something that is 99% survivable, without the stinking shot?
Because because a 1.6% chance of dying from the virus is much worse than a 0.0015% chance of dying from the vaccine. The vaccine is not risk free. It's not perfectly safe. But it appears based on the information we have at this time, that the vaccine is far far safer than getting the virus.
I can hermit. So I have the option of waiting. I have my second date this year in a public restaurant coming up on Friday. Couldn't talk her into just coming to my house for dinner. But many people can't hermit.
They have to choose between two alternatives getting the vaccine or risking getting the virus. Neither is risk free. But weighing the risks it's obvious which one appears safer on the information we currently have.
I’d like to see the odds of recovery from COVID using HCQ or Ivermectin and Zinc, along with Vitamins C & D ad maybe antibiotics.
They are comparing the vax numbers to untreated COVID patients. Treated COVID cases need to be included in the comparison.