. . . in response to another’s claim that it is. Like I said, I made no claims, but questioned claims to this effect in light of the “evidence” for such claims to be quite specious. Please review the posts.
How is the burden of proof NOT on you? It was YOU, not me that suggested women are not the largest base of support for the Democratic Party …
As I said, I made no claims, so I have no burden of proof to shoulder. But the “proof” put forward to the effect of women being such large supporters of the Democratic Party is highly questionable (at best) and remains so. And this is “proof” you readily swallow and expect me to swallow, which leads me to believe that you yourself are not willing to search out such proof yourself that you ask of me, but are content with the assertions of the alphabet networks, the failed VNS and the failing Edison Research. I do not take kindly to proof by assertion.
If you can post ANY sort of fact or statistic to support your claim from ANY source then I will except (sic) it. But you won’t, because there just aren’t any out there …
If it is indeed “data”. And no, they have no credibility. But thanks anyway.
According to Pew Research (I know they’re lefty so throw this data out right?)
“Absolutely untrue. The base of the Democratic Party has always been white left-wing males.”
You made no claim? Okie dokey…