I did not say you accused me of being a “conspiracy kook”, but being like them, as you did in Post #26.
Your response reminds me of conspiracy kooks who dismiss any evidence that Oswald acted alone by saying the evidence was tampered with …
Pushing unreliable sources at me, and one that has been shown to be egregiously false in particular, is not showing me proof that I am wrong. Instead, it adds confirmation to my views. The burden of proof is not on me, further, since I made no claims and questioned the veracity of the claims.
However I will say it’s pretty obvious you’re the type of person that simply won’t admit when they’re wrong …
How is the burden of proof NOT on you? It was YOU, not me that suggested women are not the largest base of support for the Democratic Party. You have not provided a shred of evidence to support that claim. I guess we’re just supposed to take your word for it right?
If you can post ANY sort of fact or statistic to support your claim from ANY source then I will except it. But you won’t, because there just aren’t any out there.
In the meantime here’s another little fact for you to think about. According to Pew Research (I know they’re lefty so throw this data out right?) in 2018 56% of women identify or lean towards the Democratic Party compared to just 44% for men.