[SoCal Pubbie]

How was 26 ad hominem? Do you understand the meaning of the word? I made no statement against you as a person. It was simply an observation. It’s impossible to sway dyed in the wool JFK conspiracy hounds because if you provide facts they’ll simply say the evidence can’t be trusted.

Just about every source I could link, like NBC News or any other source can be labeled “leftist.” Since every source I can find says the majority of Women vote for Democrats, why don’t you show me a source that states otherwise?

The link below indicates that the last time a Republican won the majority of female voters in a nationwide vote was in 1988:

https://cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/ggpresvote.pdf

[Olog-hai]

Accusing me of being like “conspiracy kooks” was the ad hominem,, which translates from Latin as “at the man”.

And as I suspected, your link is a liberal one. Rutgers University, as are their sources (SeeBS/NYSlimes, the discredited VNS, never mind Edison Research/NEP with its own very large problems). And since you say “labeled ‘leftist’” rather than actually be leftist, your own ideology comes into question.