Date in 2021 | Cumulative VAERS deaths | Cumulative Fully vaccinated | Calculated Deaths per 100K Fully Vaccinated |
February 1 | 1,395 | 7,617,413 | 18 |
March 1 | 2,577 | 29,435,446 | 8.8 |
April 1 | 3,679 | 63,676,884 | 5.8 |
May 1 | 4,232 | 110,085,143 | 3.8 |
June 1 | 4,375 | 139,242,635 | 3.1 |
Table: Comparing VAERS death rates per 100K vaccinated over time. The vaccine death rate was calculated by dividing VAERS deaths per month by the total vaccinated. Cumulative total vaccinated was provided by the CDC’s COVID Data Tracker.
If values prior to December (left bar in Graph 3) are subtracted from values December to June (right bar in Graph 3), the number of excess “unclassified” deaths is 32,060. This is comparable to Steve Kirsch’s difference of 25,800 (My calculation may be higher because I downloaded the data a few days after Kirsch posted the video).
Graph3: Total “unclassified” deaths before and after vaccine availability. Death rates were provided the CDC’s “Weekly Provisional Counts of Deaths by State and Select Causes.”
A total of 32,060 vaccine-related deaths from December to June comes out to a death rate of 21 per 100,000 fully vaccinated. This is almost the same the VAERS death rate recorded for the beginning of February (Table). Is this another “coincidence”?
For the sake of argument, let’s suppose a massive number of people reporting these “unclassified” deaths were unsure if their loved one had died from the vaccine, so they avoided reporting to VAERS in fear of being prosecuted for the federal crime of “false reporting.” How could the CDC have failed to notice this trend in “unclassified” death?
For the sake of argument, let’s suppose that after February the CDC started relocating massive number of vaccine-related adverse events to another database to ensure their vaccination drive proceeded without interruption.
Occam’s razor favors the second scenario, but either way the CDC has a lot of explaining to do.