Translated: They are not counting the 'breakthrough' cases which don't result in hospitalization because it exposes the flaw in PCR testing, which is tagging people as 'positive' and 'breakthrough case' when, in fact, they never had the virus.
It is a conundrum for a disgraced government which has totally botched the handling of this 'crisis', including BOTH the push to quarantine AND inoculate the 2/3 of the population almost totally unaffected by this virus.
Although some here at FR would like to label me since I am fiercely opposed to mandating wholly experimental shots on a healthy populace under a crisis of hysteria & fear (smacks of 1976, ironically), it's clear that (yes) the 'vaccines' appear to be working.
But it is also CLEAR that the government is keen to protect its backside and obfuscate key facts & data points (which history dictates that they've been doing all along. i.e. 'deaths with COVID' & alterative treatment efficacy. Look at India this week, results borne SOLELY as a result of alternative treatments). I maintain that there are long term risks/consequences of these experimental shots and that it is a dangerous extension of manipulation for those in defense of such shots to point to short term advantages...
...particularly when those advantages are to a population less affected by the virus than by the hazards of operating a motor vehicle.
That's because there was NO breakthrough case, no virus. I predict that MLB suspends testing and that negative test result requirements elsewhere will be removed in the coming weeks to further 'de-emphasize' the effects of these 'vaccines' as they continue their full court press to serve them to healthy children.
The hypocrisy is outlined better in another source here:
To those with open eyes, this story is pervasive propaganda.
Let's see who defends it...
ππΌ ππΌ