I don’t agree with this Redstate writer. This is the same FIB that ran the dishonest Russia Hoax. They have lost all credibility. Giving the the benefit of the doubt shows that you are ignorant, insane or evil.
Audio and video to the above.
Full Twitter thread.
https://twitter.com/DarrenJBeattie/status/1405932595582488577
“Dishonest” ... you mean “illegal.” Also, this outstanding (cough) agency did not pursue the persons who “filed a complaint” with the feds to start the “investigation” into a nonexistent crime. Something is terribly wrong in our institutions and I pray we survive.
>>This is the same FIB that ran the dishonest Russia Hoax.<<
You mean the FBI? lol Don’t be skeered.
They ARE monitoring this site and others for what they perceive is political dissent and their stupid political “whitey supremacist” witch hunt.
I watched Carlson’s presentation of Darren Beattie’s (the Revolver writer) allegations regarding the FBI. The natural-born cynic in me was troubled by the employment of the logical fallacy of the false conclusion (If it isn’t this then it MUST be that).
Beattie essentially claimed that, since the DOJ had yet to charge Person One, Person Two, etc, (much less actually identify them by name) these UC’s (unidentified Co-conspirators) MUST be FBI agents or CI’s (Confidential Informants).
The (not so) funny thing is that Shipwreckedcrew resorted to the very same logical fallacy in his criticism of Beattie.
The point of this exercise is the differentiation between “Is this true?” vs. “Can this be true”.
They also have a terrible problem of letting all these mass shooters slip through their fingers.