Posted on 06/18/2021 8:44:39 AM PDT by Kevmo
Re: [Vo]:Muons: 'Strong' evidence found for a new force of nature
Jones Beene Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:11:49 -0700
It is possible that whatever it is Cambridge may have found relative to muons also relates to surprisingly efficient muon production in the Holmlid/Norront reactor... apparently there is a mystery particle which affects muons in a previously unknown way ?
BTW from their site, Norront have 3 muon reactors working in Norway and one in Sweden.
Things are getting interesting...
This whole UDD *leads to* muon thing may be near, or even gone past the proverbial "tipping point"... when we look back on it in a couple of years.
Jones
H LV wrote:
PBS Space Time
Why the Muon g-2 Results Are So Exciting!
https://youtu.be/O4Ko7NW2yQo
Harry
Muons: 'Strong' evidence found for a new force of nature
https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677
quotes:
.... There is currently a one in a 40,000 chance that the result could be a statistical fluke - equating to a statistical level of confidence described as 4.1 sigma.
A level of 5 sigma, or a one in 3.5 million chance of the observation being a coincidence, is needed to claim a discovery. ....
Prof Ben Allanach, from Cambridge University, who was not involved with the latest effort, said: "My Spidey sense is tingling and telling me that this is going to be real. ....
The Muon g-2 experiment involves sending the particles around a 14-metre ring and then applying a magnetic field. Under the current laws of physics, encoded in the Standard Model, this should make the muons wobble at a certain rate.
Instead, the scientists found that muons wobbled at a faster rate than expected. This might be caused by a force of nature that's completely new to science.....Harry
That was written to back your comments up.
I know it was.
I try hard to discourage the seagulls but there is no support from the moderators, even though JimRob posted the rules and they heavily enforce that set of rules on Qanon threads.
As long as that situation exists, we’ll likely have gangtrolls inhabiting these threads, trying to pollute them.
Yeah, I see the disruption. I don’t care for it either.
No problem.
I like asking folks nicely.
We’ll see how it goes.
Think of me when you see more of it.
I like asking nicely as well. Seagulls have been disrupting these threads for more than a decade.
That’s asking one side for far, far too much patience.
I don’t disagree, but I’ll try to help if you’ll let me know.
Because I do not understand the science well, I have to ask: Is the usage of the word "every" above a typo or a particular meaning I am unaware of?
only a small population of deuterons is every in that transient BEC state.-—> only a small population of deuterons is ever in that transient BEC state.
That’s what I thought, but each science specialty seems to redefine some otherwise common words to mean specialized things.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.