"But the appeals court took things a step further, citing that Burnett’s sentence was far too lenient.
The original trial judge in 2019 had reduced Burnett’s sentence because she could face hardships in prison due to her being an “openly gay woman.”

To: Enterprise

Such a delightful princess!
To: Enterprise
Sounds like attempted murder of a police officer.
3 posted on
06/17/2021 12:42:37 AM PDT by
2aProtectsTheRest
(The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
To: Enterprise
After the story of this little princess was this.
“A federal appeals court has reaffirmed that fleeing violence is not a valid claim for asylum in the United States.”
Get out, go back to whatever crap hole you’ve fled.
5 posted on
06/17/2021 2:44:15 AM PDT by
Joe Boucher
(You Go Donald.)
To: Enterprise
No sympathy for the defendant from me. But I will note that reaching into a vehicle like this trooper did does not sound like good police procedure.
6 posted on
06/17/2021 3:04:57 AM PDT by
Stingray51
( )
To: Enterprise
The court increased the sentence for the crime of listening to Taylor Swift?
7 posted on
06/17/2021 5:02:43 AM PDT by
Natty Bumppo@frontier.net
(We are the dangerous ones, who stand between all we love and a more dangerous world.)
To: Enterprise
“The original trial judge in 2019 had reduced Burnett’s sentence because she could face hardships in prison due to her being an “openly gay woman.”
I see this as a real problem, what the hell does one’s sexual perversions have to do with sentencing in a traffic trial?
9 posted on
06/17/2021 6:26:34 AM PDT by
Fireone
(When they pry them from my cold, dead, unvaccinated hands.)
To: Enterprise
Being lesbian in a women's prison is not going to endanger her in the least, not if there is any accuracy to 60 Days.
11 posted on
06/17/2021 9:34:38 AM PDT by
heartwood
(Someone has to play devil's advocate other.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson