It was a police officer shooting an unarmed person under circumstances where deadly force wasn't required. Yet the shooting was ruled justified. Unfortunately similar shootings happen all to often, with similar rulings. If you want to call that an assassination then whatever.
I wasn’t the one who called it an assassination. Vladimir Putin did, so you can ask him....whatever.
But.......
1. Can you shed some light on the ‘similar shootings’ that happen all too often?
Yes they do happen. But, I’m having trouble remembering any like this. I’m comfortable saying that many of the ‘similar shootings’ you may be fantasizing about are encounters where law enforcement is investigating something, the other guy isn’t listening to what they cops are saying or asking, the encounter quickly escalates and things go sideways. Sometimes resulting in the shooting of an unarmed individual.
***NOT SAYING THEY’RE RIGHT. THEY’RE JUSTIFIED. AND I’M NOT...REPEAT...NOT...SOME BOOTLICKING HOLSTER SNIFFER. I was in law enforcement for over 15 years and have no problem calling BS when I see it. ****
2. Similar rulings? Are you referring to the fact that LEO’s have “gotten off” in instances where an unarmed person was shot?
3. Can you name me ONE of these instances where the identity of the police officer/deputy was hidden from the public? Can you name me ONE instance where the identity of the police officer/deputy wasn’t known and where they DIDN’T the police ID photo plastered all over the news?
Violence and death was needed to support the roll-out of a narrative. The gunman was clearly ordered by a higher-up to supply what the lame “insurrectionists” were lamely not supplying on their own. You should not be as sanguine as you appear to be about nothing blameworthy or sinister presumably having happened. At least not without learning and processing a whole lot more information than has been officially provided.