Covid vaccine given to half a billion in a short space of time with 5800 deaths(with names even). Vs Covid vaccine given over 10 year to same number of people only divide the number by 10 for each year. Now create ratios in proportion for all the other shots that are out there with each vaccine having a certain amount of deaths associated with it. Add up the numbers given for each particular vaccine out there for a total for 10 years and then add up their reported adverse side and lethal effects total for 10 years. I think you’d find that the numbers are very small for all vaccines and would be for covid shots too had the vaccine been doled out over 10 years after the initial flurry of vaxes for the first year.
The grim truth is that the Governmental officials and the mad vaccine scientists have made a calculation that in order to have the best out comes with dangerous diseases that could overwhelm us if unchecked, they have accepted that a few will die of of any given vaccine.(and they don’t want it talked about too much with the general public) If the social consensus arises that we must do away with most vaccines and their rah rah witch doctors, we must then decide as a society how much risk with resurgent epidemics we are willing to tolerate.
The grim truth is that the Governmental officials and the mad vaccine scientists have made a calculation that in order to have the best out comes with dangerous diseases that could overwhelm us if unchecked, they have accepted that a few will die of of any given vaccine.(and they don’t want it talked about too much with the general public)
*************************************************
No that isn’t accurate. As I have posted here repeatedly the developers of the vaccine did NOT expect what we are seeing. This has been a mistake, the vaccine did not work as engineered.
“Weinstein: That is one problem it isn’t where it’s supposed to be ideally. And the other problem is and this is your area of expertise is what these vaccines do is that they encode spike protein alone so that the immune system so that it will learn to recognize spike protein and it will catch it quickly when one is confronted with covid. But, the spike protein itself we now know is very dangerous...it’s cytotoxic. Is that a fair description?
Malone: More than fair and I alerted the FDA about this risk months and months and months ago and we had discussions. So, just to nail the point home, they did know. I did send them manuscripts and their determination was they didn’t think that was sufficient documentation of the risk that the spike was biologically active.
Weinstein: We now know the spike protein is very dangerous we know that it is biologically active
Malone: It is dangerous and biologically active
Weinstein: we also know if it was very dangerous, but if it did what the brochure on these vaccines says it should do which is lodge in the membrane of the cells that are doing the transcribing it would be a lot less destructive, right?
Malone: I thinks that’s fair and it is not just the documentation of the vaccine; it’s the prior literature that was put out by the people who developed it, that developed these clones so they were aware there was a risk of the spike being biologically active and having adverse events if it did not stay stuck to the cells that were transfected that got the mRNA and made it. They used a genetically engineered method of putting a transmembraned domain on it to insure that it stayed anchored and stayed put and they did limited non-clinical studies to say “looks like it stays stuck; we engineered it to stay stuck” and they published that.
Malone: Here’s the thing; that’s generally not good enough in a non-clinical data package so before we get a product released in humans in the normal situation where we are not in a rush we have some really rigorous tests that have to be done on animals and revealing that spike gets cleaved off of expressed cells and becomes free is something that absolutely should have been something that is known and understood well before this is ever put in humans so I will just leave it at that.
*********************************
“Well, I finally got to the end. Yes, I imagine Weinstein regrets the title, too...:-) Especially since the summary was more along the lines of we will be stuck with this forever according to the mRNA inventor.
The part that was most interesting is in the last half wherein the scientist outlines the “signals” from the bio-distribution study coupled with the VAERS data that he and his FDA buddies are most concerned about. The heavy concentration of lipid nanoparticles in the bone marrow both explains the adverse effects they are seeing (thrombocytopenia) and portends future concerns about hematologic (cancer) diseases.
And they are also concerned about reproductive concerns based on concentrations in the ovaries.
Big emphasis on the inadequacy of the public health agencies and the pressure and censorship that is making telling the truth impossible for anyone in the system. Overall, depressing though the scientist did report they are not yet seeing any indication of “antibody-dependent enhancement.”