Sure, but then there is Peru that mass distributed Ivermectin and since then has had the highest Covid death rate in the world.
A lot of other things are going on the Delhi and Peru at the same time, which is why these observational studies don’t tell us very much.
Did a search (Google, then DuckDuckGo) and found much different results using DDG.
For example with DDG found this:
https://trialsitenews.com/real-world-evidence-the-case-of-peru/
In these eight Peruvian State analyses, ivermectin distributions preceded sound reductions in deaths amount and infection fatality rate. The variation in the number of detected cases or the vulnerable population decrease can’t explain the mortality and lethality improvement. Likewise, other possible explanations, such as crossed immunity with dengue, or mere causality, have been discarded due to their lack of consistency or implausibility.
The bottom line: treatment with Ivermectin is the most reasonable explanation for the decrease in the number of deaths and the fatality rate in Peru. Its implementation in public policies is a highly effective measure to reduce the mortality and lethality of COVID-19.
Could the propaganda media (with Google help) be trying to mislead?
vermectin for COVID-19 in Peru: 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p<0.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted
Peru not seeing results using Ivermectin narrative could very well be Fake News? Sorta like the retracted Lancet article about HCQ.
The other issue is covid seems to have a natural cycle where it peaks then falls off in about 6 weeks. Some of the “success” with ivermectin may actually just be the natural cycle of the disease despite what free republics own armchair medical corps may tell you. They are experts without having treated one patient with the disease