New discovery shows human cells can write RNA sequences into DNA

Phys.org ^ | Thomas Jefferson University

[CJ Wolf]

Yes sir re.

[CJ Wolf]

Not aliens, insectiods. They will have red cidca DNA eye soon. It is a symptom, another one is they will sing at 80 decibles and taste good grilled. Da vax cicadas cometh
V

[PCPOET7]

wont pretend to know anything in this area but I will ask you and others who claim to understand all of this and are willing to tell us to take a vaccine that is based on a totally new method of giving a level of resistance to a disease that is experimental and has no real studies done on it yet that have lasted more then 18 months. my next Question is how sure can you be about your judgment on something that has to many unknowns.

[EEGator]

That question hurts me.

The greatest short boxing fight ever.
“Marvelous” Marvin Hagler
Tommy “The Hitman” Hearns

[DannyTN]

Questions:

• How often does it occur?
• Are the vaccines in anyway like the polymerase that was studied?
• How would we test to see if this is happening with the vaccines?
• Can it be done in a lab?
• Can we take samples from some of the vaccinated?
• Can we take samples from some of the Long haulers
• If the vaccine is reverse transcripted, is the virus also reverse transcripted>
• The virus generates more rna and spike proteins, so wouldn't the DNA changes be expected to be higher with the virus than the vaccine?
• I read somewhere that the virus changes DNA expression. Does it change the DNA or just elicit a response?
• Can we use this technology to introduce Williams-Beuren syndrome into unfriendly and hateful people?

[DannyTN]

"Can we use this technology to introduce Williams-Beuren syndrome into unfriendly and hateful people?"

The more I think about this, it has real possibilities.

• You could release a gender specific virus that made women more loyal and friendly. This could dramatically decrease the divorce rate. Improve the nation's growth rate without the need for immigration.
• Stepford wives without the chip implants. An organic version. Everyone says organic is better.
• Or you could use a race specific virus in bio-warfare. Instead of a virus that causes a pandemic and economic devastation, you could make China a lot more friendly, less aggressive and more willing to please their neighbors.
• You could use one that couldn't replicate very many times to clean up cities with high crime and bad attitudes.
• Maybe even be able to empty prisons.
• Use it to cure depressions. If people are focused on pleasing others, then they won't have time to be depressed.
• If the geneticists of Botany Bay had just thought to include Williams-Beuren syndrome into their super humans, there would have been no need for exile. Sure we would lose the basis for the best star trek movies. But the episodes with Harry Mudd would be more interesting.

/mad evil genius mode off.

[momincombatboots]

mRNA is a single strand of nucleotides.. proteins are not. Where does the mRNA get additional nucleotides to produce a folded 3D protein. Are they saying 1+0=2 ? Yes that sounds like the claim.

[DannyTN]

Really? One of my best evil genius ideas and you respond with a simple criticism of the article claims?

That’s okay, you’ll do better once my attitude adjusting Williams-Beuren syndrome viral vaccine is released.

[Political Junkie Too]

There’s still no way for the mRNA to enter the cell nucleus, still no way to prevent it from being immediately transported back out by transport proteins if it somehow did make it in

Why add the "if it did" part if there is no way in? Is that a hedge of doubt to an initially certain reply?

-PJ

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Did you computer detect a virus?

[Exit148]

Sorry. I’ve never been into boxing. When my sons were in high school, i followed the wrestling team, but that is it. College basketball and pro football/baseball are my favorite sports.

[EEGator]

As a female, you get a pass. :)

[Exit148]

Thank you. BUT— if i should get interested in boxing—- watch out!

[Revel]

The browser said the sight was unsafe.

[ckilmer]

Do you buy some of the aging scientists claims that on path for aging is loss of information. Cells/mitochondria lose the ability to communicate with each other. Epigenetic information is lost.

That, by an large, at least theoretically a lot of this information can be restored.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

I’m not entirely sure what your first question is because there’s a lot of words in there, but not a really clear question. What I gather is you’re asking why people are willing to recommend a vaccine that only has ~18 months of studies done on it (and it’s more like 15 so far). The reason is that the studies done thus far have given no indication of leading into problem areas and it’s vanishingly rare to see side effects more than a few weeks after a medicine is given. The mRNA platform has been in progress for decades. It’s just now finally gotten cheap enough to be financially viable at large scale. There’s solid understanding of the mechanisms involved and once the antigen is produced and picked up by dendritic cells, the rest of the process is exactly the same whether it’s an mRNA vaccine, another type of vaccine, or a natural infection. The dendritic cells take the antigens to the lymph nodes and begin the process of T-cell lymphocyte training. Those in turn locate and activate matching B-cell lymphocytes. This all happens exactly the same way regardless of how the antigen came to the dendritic cell, so the only new piece here is how the antigen is being produced. Since ribosomes only have one job (producing proteins from mRNA), that’s well understood for decades as well.

This isn’t some whole new magical thing somebody just invented in their garage last Thursday. This is taking lots of very well known and well understood processes and linking them together in a specific way to produce the desired result. The number of unknowns are not actually that great.

And to be clear, I’m not telling you to get vaccinated with the mRNA vaccines or any other vaccine. I would suggest you take the time to understand the benefits to you and others and to understand any risks (particularly as they relate to allergic reaction if you have a history there or blood clots if you’re a woman of childbearing age for J&J), and then make an informed decision. If you choose to wait, or to wait for another specific vaccine that meets your own person criteria, or you want to wait for 2 years or 3 years of 5 years of study data, or you choose to never get vaccinated, that’s up to you.

I just want you to make that decision having all the information available to you and I want to make sure you aren’t basing it on misinformation and fearmongering spread by people with an agenda. But whether to take one of the vaccines or not? Totally up to you.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Which browser are you using? I’ll see if I can confirm.