Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: saintgermaine

The National Institute of Health (NIH - whom Fauci was a member at the time - perhaps still is) wrote a paper on how highly effective HCQ was on SARS back in 2005.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/


35 posted on 06/11/2021 3:15:25 AM PDT by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve

You do realize that papers printed in PubMed are often pre-prints and have not necessarily gone under peer review and the PubMed is an open source meaning pretty much anyone can publish their papers there.


36 posted on 06/11/2021 3:24:57 AM PDT by MD Expat in PA (No. I am not a doctor nor have I ever played one on TV. The MD in my screen name stands for Maryland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: 21twelve

I still do believe that HCQ as well as ivermectin along with zinc etc. is still as effective as it ever was and continues to be. In the mean and between time some people were paid off to change their minds aside from that there also appears to be a more sinister side to the whole thing, even so I don’t subscribe to conspiracy theories, I come to believe more and more that the other idea behind the vaccine is population control, it may not work suddenly but over time. A couple of interesting articles I came across served to confirm my suspicion. They are DAEGLE FORECAST PART 1 & DAEGLE PREDICTIONS PART 2. They are long but worth reading. I am quite sure if you Google for them you will be able to bring them up.


43 posted on 06/11/2021 9:21:57 AM PDT by saintgermaine (Saintgermain the time traveler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson