Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

With respect to the so-called vaccines, your criteria for acceptability of the side-effects seems to center around survivability and recovery. I see that as an unwelcome risk with a fortunate outcome.

Yes, information requires context. And good to know you’re open-minded to the informed decisions not congruent with your vax evangelism.

I challenge you to raise any aspect of the vax agenda that is questionable.


35 posted on 06/11/2021 11:21:39 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric

I wouldn’t call it the “vax agenda”, but personally if my kids were under 12, I would absolutely hold off for a while before giving them these vaccines. I don’t see a clearly positive risk/reward trade-off there at this point. A lot of doctors are seeing that line closer to mid-teens (which is typically where complications begin to manifest), while some others see that line further up.

In other words, I’d be in no hurry to vaccinate a 5 year old at this point. Not unless evidence emerges showing that they suffer any significant consequences of infection.


38 posted on 06/12/2021 11:18:54 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson