Actually all folks. Right now COVID mortality is 1% total. Most people won't get and spread COVID and they should take that into account too. But for the others the vaccine is worth looking at, objectively.
You are absolutely correct - but looking at data "objectively" nowadays is darn near impossible.
I've hated the phrase that has been used nearly ad nauseam for the past year and a half:
'we are following the science', or, 'we are doing science'.
No we're not - we should be using the 'scientific method' and following, or reacting to, the data - not the "ScienceTM".
But there is the rub -- I do not believe the gate-keepers of the data. The CDC has shown themselves to be such shameless liars regarding the data (e.g., the real death rates due to CoVid, and the real number of CoVid cases) that I would not trust anything coming out of their office. And I certainly won't believe anything told by the MSM (or other Government mouthpiece).
So I agree with you - it is right to look at the data objectively - but since it is impossible in today's environment to believe the keepers of the data - I have to stick with anecdotal comments.
So here were are ... I won't be taking this experimental concoction, and I'm certainly praying that the concerns about it are overblown, and that the harm is 'minimal' (although anyone harmed is one too many - even if a lot of people believe it is worth the collateral damage).
It’s only right for others if you actually believe the data that claims 550,000 dead in the US. However, look at some of the research that said 90% of those were false positives and died from another cause, you are now looking at the same numbers as the annual flu. And, if you look at Pfizer’s own study they say it reduces the risk by .7% vs no shot.