My, my. Such condescension.
Not quite sure I follow, since I of course, am but one of the unwashed.
But since we’re on the subject of immunity, please explain the results of the trial by Muller et al:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.03.21251066
In this study, nearly a third of “vaccinated” patients over the age of 80 did not produce antibodies to the CCP virus, even after a second Fauci shot - you would agree that this age cohort is indeed the most vulnerable to the CCP virus and would stand to benefit most from the Fauci shot. So why didn’t they? Was the shot worth the risk in this case?
Also, do these blessed “vaccines” really reduce mortality due to the CCP virus? I’d like to know. Do you have data on that?
Again, pray tell. Enlighten me.
“ In this study, nearly a third of “vaccinated” patients over the age of 80 did not produce antibodies to the CCP virus, even after a second Fauci shot - ”
—————————————————————————————-
It’s comments like that “Fauci Shot” that make you’re entire comment questionable for accuracy.
Fauci had nothing to do with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccinations.
(Which seemed to piss him off as then he went on his media joy ride.)
President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed removed Fauci and his agency from the program. Trump had a loyal Admiral in charge.
Name dropping Fauci to get a reaction shows your “facts” might not be facts as you add in Fauci for knee jerk purposes.
Pfizer and Moderna developed their vaccines on their own.