Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

>>Jeff Lundeen: People lug around large cameras with huge telephoto lenses.

Large cameras (especially film) have larger capture.

And not all lenses are the same.

You can have a “versitile” lens but a dedicated high performance lens (for low light, for distance, etc.) can be more suitable. Depends on the task.

I heard a millennial talk radio host joking about the “old tech” of the camera used by the astronauts on the moon. “So big like something from the 40s”. They weren’t going to have much opportunity to go back and get more high definition captures ergo use a camera with a larger negative. Probably also needed to keep moon dust out of the camera.


6 posted on 06/10/2021 10:00:51 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Lean on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise
I remember those lunar cameras, they were Hasselblads. They took large-format roll film. You could get great low-light shots with Tri-X-Pan film.

What's cool about the cameras in modern phones is the sensitivity of the CMOS camera element is so great that the f-stop of the lens is high enough that you get a pinhole-camera effect and things can stay in very sharp focus even in fairly low-light.

13 posted on 06/10/2021 10:17:34 AM PDT by Bobalu (We're way past Republican versus Democrat.... This is Good versus Evil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson