Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dangerdoc; citizen; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; glock rocks; free_life; ..

The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles

Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science

http://lenr-canr.org/

Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y

Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette

https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp

Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc.


This paper was published by American Physical Society (APS) as Phys. Rev. C 101, 044609 (20 April 2020), and can be found at: https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044609.


2 posted on 06/08/2021 1:41:36 PM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All; y'all

NASA Claims Cold Fusion Without Naming It

https://hackaday.com/2020/09/28/nasa-claims-cold-fusion-without-naming-it/

58 Comments
by: Al Williams
September 28, 2020

Do you remember in 1989 when two chemists announced they’d created a setup that created nuclear fusion at room temperature? Everyone was excited, but it eventually turned out to be very suspect. It wasn’t clear how they detected that fusion occurred and only a few of the many people who tried to replicate the experiment claimed success and they later retracted their reports. Since then, mentioning cold fusion is right up there with perpetual motion. Work does continue though, and NASA recently published several papers on lattice confinement fusion which is definitely not called cold fusion, although it sounds like it to us.
The idea of trapping atoms inside a metallic crystal lattice isn’t new, dating back to the 1920s. It sounds as though the NASA method uses erbium packed with deuterium. Photons cause some of the deuterium to fuse. Unlike earlier attempts, this method produces detectable neutron emissions characteristic of fusion.

This isn’t as seductive a proposition as having a beaker of heavy water and little else, though, because you do need a source of electrons to kick off the reaction. Still, this should point the way to future research and maybe even inspire some garage experiments.
Keep in mind there is a big difference between creating net positive energy via fusion and just fusing a few atoms together. We’ve seen a few fusors that can pull that off.

https://youtu.be/ug7B7Gsm-2Y

Posted in Science
Tagged deuterium, erbium, fusion, fusor, nasa, nuclear, nuclear fusion, nuclear power


3 posted on 06/08/2021 1:45:38 PM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: All; y'all

NASA Found Another Way Into Nuclear Fusion

By Caroline Delbert
Sep 21, 2020

NASA has made tiny, but promising steps toward lattice confinement nuclear fusion.
Magnetic fusion requires massive heat and is still not sustainable for energy use.
Deuterium is crammed into all the empty spaces in an existing metal structure.

NASA has unlocked nuclear fusion on a tiny scale, with a phenomenon called lattice confinement fusion that takes place in the narrow channels between atoms. In the reaction, the common nuclear fuel deuterium gets trapped in the “empty” atomic space in a solid metal. What results is a Goldilocks effect that’s neither supercooled nor superheated, but where atoms reach fusion-level energy.
☢️

https://youtu.be/ug7B7Gsm-2Y

“Lattice confinement” may sound complex, but it’s just a mechanism—by comparison, tokamaks like ITER and stellarators use “magnetic confinement.” These are the ways scientists plan to condense and then corral the fantastical amount of energy from the fusion reaction.

In a traditional magnetic fusion reaction, extraordinary heat is used to combat atoms’ natural reaction forces and keep them confined in a plasma together. And in another method called “inertial confinement,” NASA explains, “fuel is compressed to extremely high levels but for only a short, nano-second period of time, when fusion can occur.”

By contrast, the lattice is neither cold nor hot:
“In the new method, conditions sufficient for fusion are created in the confines of the metal lattice that is held at ambient temperature. While the metal lattice, loaded with deuterium fuel, may initially appear to be at room temperature, the new method creates an energetic environment inside the lattice where individual atoms achieve equivalent fusion-level kinetic energies.”

The fuel is also far more dense, because that’s how the reaction is triggered. “A metal such as erbium is “‘deuterated’ or loaded with deuterium atoms, ‘deuterons,’ packing the fuel a billion times denser than in magnetic confinement (tokamak) fusion reactors. In the new method, a neutron source ‘heats’ or accelerates deuterons sufficiently such that when colliding with a neighboring deuteron it causes D-D fusion reactions.”
This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

With atoms packed so densely within the atomic lattice of another element, the required energy to induce fusion goes way, way down. It’s aided by the lattice itself, which works to filter which particles get through and pushes the right kinds even closer together. But there’s a huge gulf between individual atoms at energy rates resembling fusion versus a real, commercial-scale application of nuclear fusion.

But, NASA says, this is an important first step and one that offers an alternative to the spectacular scale of major tokamak and stellarator projects around the world. Even the smallest magnetic confinement fusion reactors require sun-hot fusion temperatures that have continued to create logistical problems. There will always be use cases where that isn’t feasible to install or maintain, even after scientists finally make it work on a practical scale.
Scientists are doing cutting-edge work on all these kinds of reactors, but a way that didn’t require heating to and maintaining millions of degrees could be a lot simpler. At the very least, it could be suited to applications where a magnetic fusion reactor isn’t feasible. Before then, scientists will need to find a way to increase the rate of atomic reactions manyfold, and they say they have several ideas for how to try to do that.

©2021 Hearst Magazine Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Notice/Notice at Collection Your California Privacy Rights Interest-Based Ads Terms of Use Site Map


5 posted on 06/08/2021 1:52:01 PM PDT by Kevmo (some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

I do think something will come from this, especially as we master nano-technology. I can see us this to cold weld metals together, like they can in space.


12 posted on 06/08/2021 2:50:37 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Just because I coughed on you does not mean that I have covid. It means that we have covid. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson