ransomnote wrote: “Actually the ‘vaccines’ don’t prevent infection and spread. When Pfizer and Moderna filed with the FDA, they stated they didn’t have data on infection and spread:”
The EUA was filed in Dec of last year. After seven months, we know better.
ransomnote wrote: “Here’s a study which seems to indicate adverse reactions to the Covid ‘vaccines’ result in the ‘vaccine taking more lives than it saves.”
Doesn’t even address that question.
Now, why not superimpose the over 600,000 American Covid deaths on that graph?
No new ‘news’ from Q today?
Now, why not superimpose the over 600,000 American Covid deaths on that graph?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Because the CDC says that only 5% of those deaths were from ‘covid alone’ and the other 95% were those with an average of 4 co-morbidities (hint: They died from other causes)
Even the remaining 5% or 30,000 deaths are likely not all Covid-19 because the PCR test does not detect the presence of the Covid virus, or the illness. So it’s likely comprised of a mix of illnesses.
Then that 5% could have been up to 85% smaller because there are many medication protocols which cut the risk of dying from Covid among the most vulnerable (elderly with comorbidities) by 85%.
So if they just, you know, treated sick people there wouldn’t be a problem.
The EUA was filed in Dec of last year. After seven months, we know better.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The shoddy ‘trials’ were too small and too short and did not test ability to cut mortality, transmission, or how they impacted those over 55 years of age.
The trials couldn’t meet ‘double-blind’ study criteria because the pain and swelling of injection sites alerted many participants to which group they were in.
And now biased, casual observations and guestimates from a dishonest, treasonous Fauci/CDC are used to claim ‘we know more now.’
Well, we do know not to trust Fauci and the CDC, and certainly we know the ‘vaccines’ are extremely dangerous and unnecessary.