Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2021 the Memorial Tournament money: Purse, winner’s share, prize money payout (Fauci cost John Rahm 1.6 MILLION)
Golf News Net ^ | 6/7/2021 | Staff

Posted on 06/07/2021 6:47:52 AM PDT by 1Old Pro

The 2021 the Memorial Tournament purse is set for $9.3 million, with 68 professional players who complete four rounds at Muirfield Village Golf Club in Dublin, Ohio, earning an official-money paycheck this week.

The winner's share of the the Memorial Tournament prize pool is at $1,674,000, with the second-place finisher taking home $1,013,700.

The Memorial Tournament field is headed by Collin Morikawa, Patrick Cantlay, Viktor Hovland and more. Jon Rahm, who led by six shots after 54 holes, was forced to withdraw after a positive COVID-19 test. He will not be paid from the prize pool.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegolfnewsnet.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Sports
KEYWORDS: covid; fraud
Amazing how devastating the Wuhan Flu is, John Rahm was kicking a*s and taking names. Maybe Covid makes you golf better? Fauci just cost this guy 1.6 BIG ones. Plus, he may not be able to play in the next major, The U.S. Open.
1 posted on 06/07/2021 6:47:52 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Interestingly enough, just coincidence. Cantalay, the winner, was a favorite of Jack’s, in fact, he has worked with him and mentored him.


2 posted on 06/07/2021 6:52:13 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

If I were Rahm, I’d sue. If he was vaccinated, he was no threat to anyone. Not to mention the tests post a high percentage of false positives.

The damages should be astronomical. It is very rare for even a top flight golfer to play four great rounds in a row to win a tournament.


3 posted on 06/07/2021 6:55:20 AM PDT by DeplorablePaul (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I don’t get why he had to be literally escorted of the golf course like that.
He was obviously not in acute medical distress. I had hoped we were done seeing such moments of hysteria.
They are lucky he was a gentleman, and didn’t try to break somebody’s jaw.


4 posted on 06/07/2021 6:58:58 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Yes, they are friends.


5 posted on 06/07/2021 7:00:21 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (Let's make crime illegal again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lee martell
They are lucky he was a gentleman, and didn’t try to break somebody’s jaw.

Yes, I'm sure he was seething, he can run hot, but he kept his cool. Credit to him.

6 posted on 06/07/2021 7:01:05 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (Let's make crime illegal again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
He will not be paid from the prize pool.

I hope he is paid from the much bigger lawsuit pool.

7 posted on 06/07/2021 7:09:11 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Access to the free and #OpenInternet is an essential human right in modern society.” -- Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

Democrats eliminate the competition anyway possible and always fix the outcome just another reason that sports betting is popular.


8 posted on 06/07/2021 7:14:27 AM PDT by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

There are factions in the Loonie Left that now believe THEY are the law.
This will become the norm unless Americans unite against it.


9 posted on 06/07/2021 7:18:21 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

John Rahm 6old interviewers that the worst of it for him is that he will not be seeing his mom and dad, who he has not seen since the Covid mess started, and they just arrived from Spain hoping to see him the day after the tournament.

John’s comments to the newscasters who talked privately to him were very much looking ahead, not looking back.


10 posted on 06/07/2021 7:51:17 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The tragic thing would be a false positive due to getting the vaccine. That happened to my son’s father-in-law who had to cancel his trip to his Dr. in Brazil for an important procedure. only for the test to turn negative a day later. He’d already cancelled the trip and now has to wait months to go.

Was this player symptomatic? If not, he could’ve worn a mask and finished the tournament. This is outrageous!


11 posted on 06/07/2021 8:12:56 AM PDT by Shery (Pray for righteousness to be restored and for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
John’s comments to the newscasters who talked privately to him were very much looking ahead, not looking back.

Classy

12 posted on 06/07/2021 8:24:54 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (Let's make crime illegal again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shery
Jon Rahm was clearly not symptomatic. He not only played 18 holes of golf at the highest level, he had played several holes in the morning to finish up the second round.

The mere fact of having two different sets of testing protocols depending on whether a person was “fully vaccinated“ or not is an outrage. If he had been “fully vaccinated“ he would not have had to be tested every single day since it was known that he had been in “close contact” with a person who tested positive. We do not even know if that person who “tested positive“ ever had any symptoms himself.

A player who has been “fully vaccinated” will not be tested daily unless he has symptoms. I wonder if the PGA tour is even requiring the general testing before a tournament of people who have been “fully vaccinated”. The pressure to get vaccinated with an experimental drug, totally unnecessary for a young healthy person, is enormous.

13 posted on 06/07/2021 9:32:24 AM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

forced to withdraw after a positive COVID-19 test.
= = =

This is the test with what, 90% false positives???


14 posted on 06/07/2021 11:41:02 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (My /s is more true than your /science (or you might mean /seance))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob
This is the test with what, 90% false positives???

Hopefully they did a re-test, sheesh.

15 posted on 06/07/2021 11:44:03 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (Let's make crime illegal again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob; 1Old Pro
I wonder how many amplifications were used on Rahm's PCR test before it showed a positive.

In addition, using the same sample for the retest is ridiculous. If the first test had been contaminated, the result would be the same. If a later sample was used, it would be even more likely to show a positive if the person was actually sick with Covid-19.

Using a different test would make more sense since the test was not time relevant, such as in a bike race, when it is trying to see if the person was using a performance enhancing drug at the time of the comeptition.

16 posted on 06/07/2021 4:56:18 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson