[Steve Van Doorn]

Peer-reviewed research from @TheLancet
shows that the experimental vaccines reduce your chance of catching COVID-19 by:
Pfizer: 0.8%
Johnson & J: 1.2%
Moderna: 1.2%
AstraZeneca: 1.3%
So, basically NO prevention, NO immunity, No Antibodies
https://archive.vn/4O1PI

with in the variance of error. which means zero. This is the same test group and doctors which others miss interpreted to say they had a 95% effectiveness back in December.
The Animal testing came out the same way

The young rhesus macaques have similar ACE2 receptors to human children. They seem to have no significant changes in these tests.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-21389-9

[Steve Van Doorn]

vaccine from merriam-webster just now looked up. Generally... (anything) which the body creates an immune response.

said, "THEY ARE VACCINES"
in theory they did try to make a vaccine by mutating a hemoglobin using an aluminum cation (positively charged nano-particles)
The experiment failed to produce any antibodies. From my post 172 in both human testing and animal testing none of the vaccines created an immune response.

[Honorary Serb]

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577

[HandyDandy]

Are the rhesus macaques Rh-?