Posted on 06/05/2021 10:02:24 AM PDT by Kevmo
Cold Fusion Ping List
Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science
—
http://lenr-canr.org/
Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y
Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette
https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp
-——— ——————————
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc.
So these internal electrons are just hiking around the outside of the neutrons? Need to know before I blow up the block.
Oops too late.
I was still in college getting my chemistry degree when “cold fusion” raised its ugly head.
Does this contradict the theory that neutrons are composed of quarks, not leptons?
I learned that from Venus Flytrap.
Love, Bailey & Jennifer
(and the answer is Bailey)
TexasGator is not welcome on these cold fusion threads. We ask the mods to enforce JimRob’s posted rules.
Is there some kind of super-duper ultrachemical theory to explain the excess heat that has been observed more than 150 times in peer reviewed journals?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UHS883_P60
It also contradicts what Fermilab thinks it knows:
Hi Boris,Let me start with your statement, that " If it is made of proton, electron and neutrino it could be as stable as atom of hydrogen? "
The answer to this is that not really. A neutron is not made of a proton, electron and an antineutrino. These particles are only its decay products. A neutron is made of 3 quarks, one up quark, and 2 down quarks and many many "intermediate particles" called gluons which carry the interaction between the quarks. These gluons are exchanged very often, so the quarks feel each of other.
Neutrons do not always decay. Let me be more specific. You know, that most of the matter around us is made out of atoms. Atoms have nucleae and electrons. In the nucleus you usually find protons and neutrons. I am sure you agree with me, that in your everyday life, you DO NOT SEE cars or houses or ... decaying, because their neutrons would decay! In other words, when a neutron is hidden in an atomic nucleus, it is extremely stable and it does not decay according what you wrote. ( Yes, there are some radioactive elements which are not stable, and their neutrons decay into protons, but let us leave them aside for a second.)
On the other hand, if you have a free neutron, taken away from a nucleus, it does decay. So why is that? First of all, you know that so far science recognizes 4 types of interactions (forces), namely the electromagnetic, gravitational, weak and strong interaction. When a neutron is buried into a nucleus, it feels mostly the strong interaction. The quarks are "tight" very strongly to each of other, and it is not allowed for them to change into uud ( the proton) and electron and antineutrino. For the neutron decay, the weak interaction is responsible. If a neutron is freed from a nucleus, the weak interaction of quarks will play the major role, and since the proton is lighter than a neutron, it is allowed for the neutron to go to this lighter stage by radiating out an electron and antineutrino. If you are still wondering and still have some questions, please ask
- bye, Arnold Pompos
Source: Physics Questions People Ask Fermilab: Neutron Decaay
Hell, I don’t know. You’re the true believer.
Stamp those feet, Mister Demandy-Pants.
We ask the mods to enforce JimRob’s posted rules.
Who is "We"?
It’s been forty years.
We’ve been promised cold fusion almost as long as we’ve been promised flying cars.
Who is “We”?
***The folks on the ping list. If you’re here to provoke, you are unwelcome so get lost.
Same amount of time for High Temp Superconductors [HTS], and we don’t have maglev trains nor Superconducting power lines. The difference between HTS and Cold Fusion is that HTS didn’t have an entrenched science mafia protecting their turf. If we had spent 2% of the high-temp fusion dollars on cold fusion, we’d have those flying cars by now.
Experiment trumps theory, every time.
~Richard Feynman
Where’s my flying car?
That what I want to know!
🙃
Where’s our hot-fusion toys? We’ve spent $hundreds of Billions in tax money, for nothing.
And we’ve been promised hot fusion twice as long.......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.