[bagster]

No, these are the VAERS numbers that are repeatedly used by all the others to demonstrate deaths. I am using the data your side uses.

Am I correct in assuming VAERS is run by CDC (your side).

Am I also correct that there are no other numbers available anywhere (in the U.S.A)?

In summation. Are you not, in effect, doing the CDC's 'dirty work' by spreading the idea that there are minimal, if any, adverse side effects (up to and including death), and what little there are, they are not significant enough in number to raise the alarm?

That's what I mean when I say CDC is 'your side'.

Or maybe I'm just on LSD.

[gas_dr]

Take it up with ransomnote, Cathy, and Jane Long all of whom repeatedly use VAERS.

I actually think VAERS is a crock of crap because itself states it is not something that demonstrates causation.

On this one, you are on a little of LSD. Its ok, I still think you are cool.