Arizona Audit: 'Voting system data' was sent to a 'lab' in Montana and we don't know why

12 News ^ | 6/03/21 | Cameron La Fontaine

[Libloather]

Dig deep & hard. Surprisingly, shutting down the count in battleground states while Plug's votes were inserted is not - 'another strange twist'.

[ScubaDiver]

For the longest time, I really thought the only way they likely cheated was by printing phony, counterfeit ballots and stuffing the boxes just like the good old days.

Now, I’m not so sure. I think counterfeit ballots were used to varying degrees. But, the door has definitely been opened on fudging the tallies, perhaps electronically.

Or perhaps the tallies were ‘massaged’ to account for the phony ballots.

[Trump Girl Kit Cat]

Second opinion needed to prove what Cyber Ninjas found is actually true!!!

[a fool in paradise]

Nothing to see here. Never mind the man behind the curtain.

Still want to know how multiple states ALL decided to “stop counting” (and then resume counting) at the same time. Coordination.

[goodnesswins]

Oh, RREEEAAALLLYYYYY???

[Flavious_Maximus]

The steal comes from the adjudication process. At any time, an election “official” can decide to change a ballot based on what they think is the true intention of the voter.

You read correctly, at any time your vote can be changed by a partisan hack official, and you have no say in the matter. This happens ALL the time, especially in Rats precincts.

https://2020electionirregularities.com/mailin/ballots-altered-in-the-adjudication-process/

[farmguy]

The key word here is “copies”.

Wait for the media to start trying to make it sound like the original data has been contaminated.

No! It wasn’t. Copies were sent, not the originals.

[b4me]

I think there is plenty of video/articles shared in recent mo nths about how the machines and software can flip the vote for one person to tally for another person. saw several postings of such. look it up :)

[tennmountainman]

U already know the answer. All of us do.

[Revel]

The cheated all of many different ways all at the same time. As you have found out the system is designed so that they can cheat right in front of your face and no one can do anything about it. It all designed that way now. Throw in some corrupt officials in key positions and everyone is screwed. Then you have this news 12 station that can’t wait to do their part in spreading the cheaters propaganda. Notice their continual use of the term “the controversial firm” as they spew exactly what the corrupt Arizona SOS office tells them to.

[hsmomx3]

Katie Hobbs will just throw her weight around because she is running for governor

[piasa]

The observer noted that Bennett did not specify what security measures were in place, what the lab in Montana is doing with the data or how long it will have the copies of voting system data.

Weird. These are just copies. Isn't that a bit like worrying about how long a subscriber is going to hang onto the Sunday paper?

[Hostage]

If it’s coming from a spokesdunce for Katie Hobbs, you can bet it’s laced with horsesh*t.

[JohnBrowdie]

. . . was sent by controversial contractor CyberNinjas to the . . .

---

the MSM created a controversy, and then proceeds to call the thing that it has maligned “controversial”.

[El Cid]

U already know the answer. All of us do.

I don't.
Is it true that the 6 (I believe it was 6) swing states all shut down their counting at the same time? And what does the 'same time' mean? Within the same hour, the same two hours, three hour? Does this take into account the different time zones (e.g., Did Michigan shut down counting at midnight, and Arizona at 9PM - this would be the 'same time' - Or was it midnight, in their respective time zones, for both)?

[ScubaDiver]

Completely agree that’s an untenable system they’ve adopted. I’m just not sure if what they’re doing in those cases was enough to overcome a 10K-vote (or more) deficit. Instead, I think eyeballing ambiguous (for whatever reason) ballots and ‘discerning the will of the voter’ like a mystical soothsayer could only tilt a very close election, like the recounts you mention.

I still think their bread & butter techniques were largely dependent on the mail-in balloting and vote harvesting elements that were so prevalent in this pandemic election.

[kvanbrunt2]

Maybe they are attempting a real or a partial audit

[Rurudyne]

Biden did bag about the scope of the vote fraud system in place. The Left wants to act like said bragging was a misspeak but it was flat up bragging. Personal knowledge that explained why he could “campaign” from his home and not worry about it.

[kvanbrunt2]

For the longest time, I really thought the only way they likely cheated was by printing phony, counterfeit ballots and stuffing the boxes just like the good old days.>>. me too but the batch failures and forced adjudications seem to be an additional vote generator.

[noiseman]

I’m just not sure if what they’re doing in those cases was enough to overcome a 10K-vote (or more) deficit. Instead, I think eyeballing ambiguous (for whatever reason) ballots and ‘discerning the will of the voter’ like a mystical soothsayer could only tilt a very close election, like the recounts you mention.

I recall that there was at least one state where an incredibly high percentage of votes were “adjudicated.” I seem to remember a number around 60%. And in all of the swing states, the adjudicated percentages were unusually high. That creates a playground for fraud that would have plenty of potential to flip an election, even if it wasn’t remotely close.