Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/03/2021 12:48:06 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

It’s like if there is a massive nuclear waste spill right next to a nuclear power plant. Doesn’t take Kojak to figure out who the prime suspect is...


2 posted on 06/03/2021 12:56:58 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Lack of a chain of mutations in the Sars-2, some researchers say, points to a genetically engineered coronavirus produced in a lab. Unlike previous new pathogens, Sars-2 has appeared ready for human cells without requiring mutation.

Many diseases can be passed directly from bats to humans. You don't need an intermediate host to catch rabies, Ebola, Marburg, histoplasmosis, etc., from bats, so why would you need an intermediate to catch a coronavirus from a bat?

Also, what does that even mean, "Lack of a chain of mutations"? Of course we don't know the exact mutations that coronaviruses undergo in bats, because we don't have samples from every infected bat. Anyway, whatever that statement is supposed to mean, nothing about it suggests an engineered virus. Evidence of engineering would be contained in the virus nucleic acid sequences. If, for example, a coronavirus contained a gene from a completely different virus, that would be pretty obvious evidence of genetic engineering. Random mutations between different populations of coronaviruses only show that the process of evolution is still going on, as we expect.

3 posted on 06/03/2021 4:17:32 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson