Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: KamperKen

In “science” there are accepted concensi (sic) that should never been disturbed or challenged. the YD event is one of those challenges. Another is that the Americas could never had been visited prior to Clovis. We do know that Austral-asian DNA is found in segments of the Native American population, as well as Polynesian. Now the question is how did they get there? They could have island and shoreline hopped up north and around to the Americas. They moight have travelled straigh across with boat and sail...frankly, we don’t really know. Neither did Hancock. But the conversation needs to take place and thrashed out.


53 posted on 06/03/2021 8:35:02 PM PDT by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: abigkahuna

But the conversation needs to take place and thrashed out.

My DNA families agree with you.

It is amazing to us how the leading Genealogy on line companies can show/document 1% African DNA down to our grand kids and grand nephews/nieces.

Yet, they then list zero DNA re Native American/ancestors, mainly the civilized tribes. Ancestors documented by them as grandparents with standard historical genealogy proof/data.

In spite of them using standard genealogy historical documents to list these people as up to 4th to 9th grandparents. None of them are listed as DNA grandparents.

Nor, do we the living descendants, show any so called Native American DNA in spite being shown as descendants of so called Native Americans.

According to the major on line Ancestor company, I have over 100 documented Cherokees and other civilized tribe ancestors/grandparents at various levels via genealogy standards.

Yet, there is zip/nadda/no DNA evidence/data re me, my siblings and other relatives.


56 posted on 06/04/2021 9:27:34 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (“Respond only to polite and intelligent posters, who don’t insult you or us! Forget the others!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna
"They moight have travelled straigh across with boat and sail...frankly, we don’t really know. Neither did Hancock. But the conversation needs to take place and thrashed out.

Hancock did not offer any theory on how the Polynesian DNA ended up found in the middle of the Amazon jungle just pointed out the anomaly. I often disagree with Hancock's conclusions but always find the information interesting and Hancock is very fastidious in separating his opinions from the facts as they are known at that time.
57 posted on 06/04/2021 7:56:26 PM PDT by KamperKen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson