Good question.
The other infringements that need to disappear are the requirement to have a federal license to manufacture firearms and the requirement to have serial numbers on firearms.
If a criminal kills half a dozen people using a car, I don't care where he got the car. I have a similar attitude toward firearms. We should assume that any criminal sufficiently motivated can obtain or manufacture a firearm. The criminals are guilty. The firearms are innocent.
So can we get SCOTUS to notice and address the phrase “shall not be infringed”?
It seems pretty straight forward and all encompassing to me.