Posted on 05/27/2021 10:20:53 PM PDT by ransomnote
That new post seems to be referring to Q. Sounds like a hack
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes. Like a hack to ‘debunk’.
Well, well, well…
The writing of the recent drop to 8ch seems wrong.
“Who helps you answer Questions?”
When Q asks questions that we have to answer for ourselves.
So not Q team.
Team B? Black hats? :D
So you think not Q?
So you think not Q?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Two FReeQs have posted that it’s signed ‘B’. That would have to be on 8k as the one on Qalerts.net has no letter signature.
Content doesn’t seem right either. So not Q.
Hmmmm... maybe the fact vs fiction applies to this q post itself, in a self-introspection kind of way.
CANCEL Q Alert
Please return all popcorn makers to their secured locations. Please stow all bags of popcorn and bottles of adult beverages to their insulated lockers until further notice.
We apologize for any inconvenience (e.g., popcorn salivary response) this may have caused.
ThankQ
If it’s a hack, then why wouldn’t the hacker sign it Q?
Unless the hacker was purposely sloppy, to impress us they he/she hacked things.
It is clear that the scientists who conducted the experiments that triggered this debate (2, 3), and who are among those who voluntarily signed onto the moratorium, have conducted their research properly and under the safest and most secure conditions.
However, the issue that has been intensely debated is whether knowledge obtained from these experiments could inadvertently affect public health in an adverse way, even in nations multiple time zones away. Putting aside the specter of bioterrorism for the moment, consider this hypothetical scenario: an important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed in a well-regulated, world-class laboratory by experienced investigators, but the information from the experiment is then used by another scientist who does not have the same training and facilities and is not subject to the same regulations.
In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario—however remote—should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?
Scientists working in this field might say—as indeed I have said—that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.
(So accd. to Falsi its OK for the bat-lady to do pretty much whatever she wants with gain of function,hes to blame for the plannedemic we have and than the kill shot many took.)
However, we must respect that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally.
We cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place.
Those of us in the scientific community who believe in the merits of this work have the responsibility to address these concerns thoughtfully and respectfully.
............
Throw this guy under the jail.
CANCEL Q Alert
Please return all popcorn makers to their secured locations. Please stow all bags of popcorn and bottles of adult beverages to their insulated lockers until further notice.
We apologize for any inconvenience (e.g., popcorn salivary response) this may have caused.
ThankQ
No trip code is troubling.
I will keep my popcorn 🍿 out. It’s already popped. Got more in the pantry.
Continued back slide...
Yes, I think a chiropractor or a hands-on PT specialist would be helpful. I think that the PT I’m seeing has a lot of extra training, she’s not at the minimum level of PT like the first guy I saw was. He was by the book, very young and inexperienced, and not very intuitive. She’s a step above as she applies what you tell her, asks the right questions, and knows her way around the muscles and tendons in the core.
Someone like that will be able to help you, I’m sure.
Q
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.