I don't know that they are. The election officials are saying there is no problem. Nobody has much proof of wrong doing because you need an audit to gather the proof. And it's up to the court's discretion to order an audit. Which they really don't want to get involved.
So what specific law are they ignoring? And what solid evidence has been brought before them.
It's more likely that the prosecutors are ignoring the laws. Or that nobody has filed criminal charges to get them to prosecute. And that could be because the laws are weak, don't assign responsibilities, don't have checks and balances or transparency to catch wrong doers and don't have penalties.
” What is clear is that courts do not want to get involved in political elections. “
Cases brought by appellants do not require a ‘prosecutor’ per se in order for adjudication; but in any case it is beyond any doubt that SCOTUS ignored Federal US Constitution law.
You may want to parse that as not ignoring the laws but that’s all it is.
” And what solid evidence has been brought before them. “
How about hundreds of affidavits alleging election malfeasance/illegality which were summarily disregarded by the courts whom you acknowledge didn’t want to get involved.
” The election officials are saying there is no problem.”
Can you hear yourself?