She needs “TRAITOR” branded on her forehead.
So we better have clear laws and strong penalties for not following those laws. And those laws need to provided checks and balances in the election process, accountability, and as much transparency as is possible without violating voter confidentiality, and they need to provide for thorough audits when questions arise.
But you can question the legitimacy of the founding of the United States.
Yes, I can question the election results, and I do!
“Question everything. Learn something. Answer nothing.” Euripides
Every American citizen has a right and a duty to question any election they think was fraudulent.
The little inbred spawn of nothingness thinks she’s nobility.
I wish Sarah Palin would run for Liz’s House seat.
That Bouchard guy has a lot of baggage. And Sarah would fit right in as Wyoming’s rep.
I wish Sarah Palin would run for Liz’s House seat.
That Bouchard guy has a lot of baggage. And Sarah would fit rught in as Wyoming’s rep.
"Article I, Section 5, Clause 1: Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of their own Members [emphasis added], and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide."
Additionally, by voting to ignore alleged voting problems on January 6, 2021, anti-Trump federal and state lawmakers violated their oaths to protect and defend the 12th Amendment (12A; electoral vote procedures).
Consider state winner-take-all laws for electoral votes for example. The major constitutional problem with such laws is that the states surrendered their power to make such laws when when they ratified 12A imo.
Excerpted from the 12th Amendment: "The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice- President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate [emphasis added];--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; […]"
Winner-take-all laws also effectively nullify (imo) the Houses’s express constitutional power to select a president from the top three electoral vote winners in the case that no candidate wins simple majority of electoral votes.
Excerpted from the 12th Amendment: “… and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President [emphasis added], the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President.
By voting to ignore possible election problems on January 6, were crook lawmakers possibly trying to avoid public scrutiny of 12A?
All federal and state lawmakers that voted to ignore alleged voting problems on January 6 need to lose their jobs under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment (14A) imo.
"14th Amendment, Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same [emphasis added], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
Finally, the states that allegedly participated in organized vote-counting fraud in 2020 elections should also lose seats in the House under the penalty of Section 2 of 14A.
"14th Amendment, Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State [emphasis added]."
In fact, given the "or in any way abridged” broad language of Section 2 regarding the weakening of ordinary voting power, Georgia should lose House seats as a consequence of activist senatorial candidates who allegedly participated in vote-counting fraud to win their seats.
Corrections, insights welcome.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!