Wish I could help.
My specialty field was Medical Physics (X-rays, Nuc Med, PET scanning, etc. Because of my position I sat in on a lot of cancer therapy meetings where immunotherapy treatment research protocols were presented. (The coffee, bagels and donuts were excellent, and I remember VERY little beyond that). I’ll bet there’s someone here who can help you with your question, though, MUCH better than I. (I’m sure Fake-Views Falsie - who know EVERYTHING - can give you an opinion. (Of course, that opinion will change tomorrow, so careful which day you pick to ask him)
The pro-vax crowd claims that this stuff is less risky than driving to/from the shot-gallery in your car. I guess if you don’t keel over in the first 30 minutes, you’re good to go.
Funny how according to radiation exposure critics, getting through the first week or so of exposure only promotes you to the 30-50 years of latent risk class.
People who “get shot” may be on the hook for ill effects that show up LONG AFTER the first day or two. Sort of like the folks who got laser corrective eye surgery 20 years ago and now are turning up blind at their eye docs.
I’ll take the HCQ/Ivermectin/mega-vitamin approach if I come down with something.
If that approach doesn’t take care of me, well, I guess God was calling me home.
(Ya gotta die of something, right???)
“Sort of like the folks who got laser corrective eye surgery 20 years ago and now are turning up blind at their eye docs.”
Wow. Interesting that you wrote that. My friend’s husband will see an eye surgeon this week for that reason. He got Lasik decades ago, and now has major issues (not blind, though). They’ll do a procedure which may help, may harm, and may do nothing. It’s a crap shoot.
I’m glad my eye surgeon in the ‘80s talked me out of it, even though it would’ve meant money in his pocket to do it.
It is hard to get information. You impressed me with your good sense, so perhaps you will know the answer to my question or perhaps suggest where I might look.
Now, I can understand, I may be kidding myself, but I do understand the cerebral venous thrombosis with thrombocytopenia in the Oxford/AZ and Janssen shots. I do not confuse this with the mRNA shots, though aware of the death of Dr. Michaels with only the platelet disorder part, and two others who recovered completely because by then the danger signs were understood. Do you know anyone if not yourself who has suggested another reasonable mechanism by which the Moderna shot is dangerous?
The closest thing to that which I have seen so far is the suggestion that they kill because they work as intended, which is to say that the spike protein itself is deadly. My friends seem to be satisfied with the fact that deaths are reported in VAERS, so I tried to look for a clue in symptom patterns and can find none. Now some are saying that the VAERS data have been manipulated and instead of thousands there have been millions. This pivot is an admission.
VAERS data could be manipulated by a conspiracy sure but that assertion is completely beside the point. How does it kill? What hypothesis is suggested for the danger?
To use your example, if you want to show that people are going blind 20 years after Lasik, then simply point out the way that the laser does that. Did blindness happen with the old cutters? Should not be hard to do.
Please pardon me if my frustration shows. I do welcome correction and contradiction. Warm regards!