The accusation that I am an accessory to murder is simply a childish reaction to being called out on their indefensible positions.
Dr Peter McCullough MD described EXACTLY what happened as to conventional medicine not having any kind of effective treatment protocol, advising patients to stay home isolated until they could no longer breathe, and denying the efficacy of therapeutics then and now and in between. All the above resulted in 85% of deaths of cv19 patients being a result of denial of reasonable medical care. Defending that position, and attacking the MDs who did not and who successfully used therapeutics, seems offline close to criminal malpractice and negligence.
Not what you said initially and I stand by my reply. Good day.
What’s happening with the prophylactic treatments is like using water on a fire.
A bucket of water is NOT going to put out a forest fire. It will put out the campfire that can cause a forest fire, but needs to be used at the campfire stage.
What’s happening with the prophylactics not working claim, is the same as if someone waited until a raging forest fire was going on and throwing a bucket of water on it and then claiming, *See, water is ineffective against fire*.
Well, at some point, that is true. But at the right point of time and in the right way, it works very well.
Nor can you pour water on a burned tree and expect it to grow again. Neither do the prophylactics repair organ damage done by the virus.
Same with antibiotics.
I had a friend who hated doctors with a passion and refused to go when she got a scratch on her leg that got infected. Instead she waited, was septic, almost lost her leg and her life. All for a want of early intervention and treatment.