[tbw2]

Gender Activists Co-Opted British Columbia’s Courts. Meet the Woman Who Stood Up to Them
https://quillette.com/2021/05/19/gender-activists-co-opted-british-columbias-courts-meet-the-woman-who-stood-up-to-them/

[monkeyshine]

Just my personal opinion, I think people should live in the real world at least a few years before making such types of decisions. 17 years old? Go to college. Flirt with people. Have a few drinks. Expand your horizons and your knowledge of societies and the world around you. Grow up, and then decide.

[a fool in paradise]

Will doctors support anorexics in living their chosen lifestyle and embracing their wanted body image?

Would any doctor remove ribs “just because” an anorexic person wanted “less bones showing”?

[Dr. Sivana]

It is getting so if I should be so unfortunate as to find myself in a court like this, that I may have to request an interpreter, as I speak standard English.

Example:

Example:
Judge: Will the witness tell us by which pronouns he wishes to be referred to?
Witness: ??
Interpreter: The judge wants to know if you consider yourself to be a man, a woman, or something else.
Witness: My name is Joe Smith. I am a man.
Interpreter: Your honor, the witness would like pronouns he and him.

[algore]

There are more than 100 pronouns. Here’s the full list…

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/List-of-pronouns.htm

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/3958994/posts

[sauropod]

.

[Albion Wilde]

I see that not many posts here reveal that anyone actually read the article— commenting on their opinions of transgenderism, when this article describes that the BC courts are way down the road of having declared transgenderism’s wildest dreams to be absolute reality, and punishing speech as a result.

The long-winded, badly edited but otherwise significant article was about the difficulty faced by any members of the BC legal profession who serve as attorneys for those opposed to the transgender disfiguration of minor children. The parents and their legal counsel are compelled by the court to argue their case in the trans-favoring pronoun language that is already prejudicial agains the parents’ defense of their child’s natural biology.