[dinodino]

What’s the “other side of the story?” They were exonerated by DNA evidence. What more do you need to know?

[Tom in SFCA]

What’s the “other side of the story?” They were exonerated by DNA evidence. What more do you need to know?

You have a lot to learn about leftism and about the world we live in.

[BobL]

“What’s the “other side of the story?” They were exonerated by DNA evidence. What more do you need to know?”

They weren’t exonerated by DNA evidence, they were exonerated by someone’s interpretation of such...and there is a far less than perfect history there.

To answer your question, I’d like to know what evidence was used to convict them. If it were circumstantial, I’d likely agree with them getting cleared - if 20 witnesses, I might think differently.

In any case, I’ve been played by the media enough times to NOT immediately believe what they say.

[bdfromlv]

There are many prison inmates that are innocent of the specific crime that they are convicted of, but 90% should have been convicted of 20-40 other crimes that were never adjudicated.