Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: doorgunner69
Amazing what he did with the crappy metallurgy of the time.

Yes, but Whittle's design didn't have as high a metallurgical demand, and had a lower power/weight ratio, I believe.

The Germans had the first "modern" jet engines, and they lasted (at the outside) 25 hours.

Whittle's engine would run forever, though.
8 posted on 05/16/2021 3:51:00 PM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: BikerJoe

Whittle’s jet and the Jumo 004 were two different approaches. Whittle’s engine was a centrifugal turbojet, which was mechanically simpler, but in the long term limited.
The German Junker Jumo 004 was an axial flow turbojet. Being lighter, it also required higher metallurgy for the turbine blades. Throw in tighter tolerances.


9 posted on 05/16/2021 8:11:49 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (Antifa=BLM=RevCom=CPUSA = CCP=Democratic Party )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson