Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

Our diverse army....remember, diversity is out new strength.

These bums were recruited. Anyone of those guns traced back to any of them should result in a accomplice to murder charge.


6 posted on 05/12/2021 9:24:15 AM PDT by Mouton (The enemy of the people is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mouton

“These bums were recruited.”

Please don’t read into the article that is trying to indict the military for this as the military is not involved. The people doing the weapons transfers were purchasing them from civilian sources around Fort Campbell, not from it.

If they had all been Methodists, or farm workers, or worked for general mills, it wouldn’t have been any difference. The reference to the military is an effort to sensationalize the crime by using this government agency that liberals hate trying to create dislike or even hatred for the military. And that disgusts me to no end. And what makes it worse, is that the article was from the Army Times and allows the reader to read the army into it.

The military will make itself available to the civilian and federal forces for backup assistance like information and latter work related actions. But they won’t be doping any criminal work until the outside sources are done.

If they are sentenced to prison outside, when they are released they are still part of the military system. That’s when Article 85—Desertion, and Article 86—Absence without leave (AWOL), go into effect. And if their unit deploys, Article 87—Missing movement.

Article 132—Frauds against the United States may be brought into the light, but that’s a tough one to get like it’s close relative, Article 134 which gives the military the ability to punish conduct that is not explicitly listed in the UCMJ, as long as it is not a capital offense—...this is tied into that....so can’t use.

They need to be a little more open about where the money for this is coming from. These three were identified in the article as a unit supply specialist, a signal support systems specialist and a fire control specialist. I recognize that they are making far more money than I did when I was active, but they couldn’t possibly have this much. Follow the money trail and get the big dogs. These guys are lackeys set up, and stupidly signing on, to being meat for the slaughter. And the article insinuates it is being done by those bad old military members.

A good reflection on the Army Times, and the Military times, both owned by ultra liberal Sightline Media Group is here:

https://popularmilitary.com/military-times-called-out-for-claiming-most-of-the-military-does-not-support-trump/

wy69


18 posted on 05/12/2021 10:56:31 AM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Mouton

btt


19 posted on 05/12/2021 11:05:08 AM PDT by GailA (Constitution vs evil Treasonous political Apparatchiks, Constitutional Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson