[gas_dr]

This is poor statistical analysis and is math used to advance an agenda. On its face it’s a bad vanity.

That being said all one has to do is look at Israel to determine population efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine. It is easy to spot.

[bagster]

This is poor statistical analysis and is math used to advance an agenda. On its face it’s a bad vanity.

Is there nothing this man doesn't know?

[heavy metal]

all one has to do is look at israel not opening its border to mexico, inviting, and continuing to distribute thousands of “disease carrying invaders” across its country during a “global pandemic” to spot the hypocrisy in your posts...

[ransomnote]

gas_dr to budj

This is poor statistical analysis and is math used to advance an agenda. On its face it’s a bad vanity.

That being said all one has to do is look at Israel to determine population efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine. It is easy to spot.

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes. Look to Israel. Prayers up for Israel.

The Israeli People`s Committee Report of Adverse Events Related to the Corona Vaccine, April 2021: Never has a vaccine injured so many.

Regarding lockdowns and mandates, Dr. Yeadon has this to say:

Former Pfizer VP issues warning: ‘This is Israel now, UK in just a few weeks’

[ConservativeMind]

Sir, RansomNote’s description is exactly what the Live Science link BudJ posted:

“What the 95% actually means is that vaccinated people had a 95% lower risk of getting COVID-19 compared with the control group participants, who weren't vaccinated. In other words, vaccinated people in the Pfizer clinical trial were 20 times less likely than the control group to get COVID-19.”

Also, from Live Science:

“All three vaccines were 100% effective at preventing severe disease six weeks after the first dose (for Moderna) or seven weeks after the first dose (for Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, the latter of which requires only one dose). Zero vaccinated people in any of the trials were hospitalized or died of COVID-19 after the vaccines had fully taken effect.”

We aren‘t told of how many in the control group had “severe disease,” but it too could have been 100%.

[ConservativeMind]

Here's a pretty funny quote from the Live Science article:

“One common misunderstanding is that 95% efficacy means that in the Pfizer clinical trial, 5% of vaccinated people got COVID. But that's not true; the actual percentage of vaccinated people in the Pfizer (and Moderna) trials who got COVID-19 was about a hundred times less than that: 0.04%.”

That sounds remarkable, right? “One hundred times less” sounds incredible.

However, they leave out that the control group had under a 1% of getting COVID-19 WITHOUT A VACCINE TO HELP THEM.

The legit Pfizer number is mentioned only in RansomNote’s post, showing 0.93% of all control people got COVID-19.

So non-vaccinated people have a “99+ times less chance” of getting COVID-19, as well.