That is correct.
They just say the mrna derived spike protein behaves differently? How is it different? Is it MORE dangerous? Does it attack other cells? They just declared that it was different. This is disgusting to anyone who relies on the western scientific method. No evidence presented.I choose not to believe their report if they
don’t back up their statements. Ph.D. denied.
Getready wrote: “They just say the mrna derived spike protein behaves differently? How is it different?”
This is a news report, not a complete scientific paper.
No, it can't "attack" other cells. The vaccine is injected into muscle tissue, and those particles that enter a cell create an S-protein. That protein stays on the cell and the cell is attacked by the immune system. It's a 1 time cycle, with no reproduction. The number of S-proteins created by your cells is hard limited by the number of nano particles in the vaccine. In fact only a fraction of the particles will successfully find a cell before the lipid envelope dissolves. That's why we have trials to determine both the safe and the effective doses.
In the study discussed here, 100,000,000 psuedovirus particles were injected into the hamsters intratracheally, that is, directly into the lungs.
Ph.D. denied.
It's a news letter. The Salk Institute is a very credible source.