Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Well the wedding guest list would be much shorter...


59 posted on 05/05/2021 1:28:38 PM PDT by TnTnTn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: TnTnTn
Some anthropologist, maybe Margaret Mead, was investigating a so-called primitive tribe and was asking about whether they allowed brother/sister marriages. The tribesmen thought it was a ridiculous question--such a man would have no brothers-in-law.

I once heard a talk about brother-sister marriage in Egypt, between ordinary people (not pharaohs and their relatives). I think it must have been from the Roman period. Apparently it happened and was not as detrimental in the long run as might be expected--those who inherited bad genes from both sides died off and those genes were eliminated from the gene pool.

Uncle/niece marriages were acceptable in Sparta--Leonidas was married to his brother's daughter. At Rome when the emperor Claudius married his own niece, Agrippina the Younger, people were appalled. But Livy has a case of a man married to his own niece in the 5th century BC and it is treated as nothing out of the ordinary.

65 posted on 05/05/2021 2:37:41 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson