Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Republican Wildcat
Either the photo / video capture is too far away, too blurry, or they just (supposedly) barely got the camera out in time and caught an “arm” of it. Even with people having HD camera and video camera readily available on hand, the “new” photos are just as bad as the ones from 50 years ago.

YEARS ago I read an article that placed two photos of "UFOs" side by side - saucer shaped and at slightly different angles. Both were "fuzzy".

One was taken by an everyday camera of the time (1970s), the other taken by a hi-res camera used for tracking missile launches. The theory was that the devices had a propulsion system that ionized the air around them, making them looked blurred.

I thought that was a reasonable deduction, so while still a bit sceptical, it will do for now.

24 posted on 05/04/2021 6:26:44 PM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Oatka

The theory was that the devices had a propulsion system that ionized the air around them, making them looked blurred.


This is coming to light more and more. The recent “tic tac” footage shot by military pilots, also show this “halo effect”. Researchers are actually going through footage and pictures because there is a belief that this effect can distinguish between real and fake sightings. However, this effect does not hold true for all cases, for example the Arizona Lights that occurred over Phoenix that thousands witnessed.


30 posted on 05/04/2021 11:22:19 PM PDT by zaxtres (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson