Arizona Audit: "We got what we were looking for"

Josh Barrett Twitter ^ | 05 03 2021 | Josh Barnett

[marktwain]

The audit must connect and validate the ballot with the voter in order to prove the fraud. Looking at ballots alone will prove nothing if the fraudulent ballots were marked and folded by hand which is the way the dems would have done it.

It is not clear your assertion as to how voter fraud was done is correct.

There are many ways to do it. It is unlikely only one was used.

One of the most contentious aspects of the use of the Dominion machines was the large number of ballots sent to ajudication. In Michigan and Nevada the number was reported over 60% of mail in ballots!

The adjudication process was never as secure as other processes.

If the adjudication process was used to fraudulently switch significant numbers of votes, this audit has a good chance of detecting it.

In addition, this process detects folds or lack of folds in ballots.

[lepton]

If that happened, then the vote totals from the audit won’t match the totals from the certified election, which would be a slam-dunk proof of fraud.

---

If that’s all they did was remove, or all they did was add. Remove and replace - which is what is actually being alleged in the post you are responding to - so they match the announced numbers completely hides it from the counts.

[missnry]

Ballots need to be professionally printed with security features that would immediately reject fraudulent ballots when scanned.

Printers have micro codes that they print on each sheet of paper... in a forensic examination the codes can be provided... so if there are a group of “suspected” ballots and they were printed on a said printer that cannot be traced back to the printer... tick tick tick tick...

[itsahoot]

The recorded forensic audit will find significant fraud!

Yes, but only if it was in favor of Trump, otherwise, most honest election in History.

[snarkytart]

that’s why this mail in ballot scam is so good, it’s very hard to catch the bad or illegitimate ballots.

[grey_whiskers]

[Gene Eric]

I was under the impression there are ballots without creases.

[CivilWarBrewing]

Yes, but if an effort was made to legitimize the non-creased mass-produced ballots by manually folding them, then a 'touch DNA' test might reveal such a FIX occurred ahead of the audit or at any time before or after the election.

I am most interested in seeing if any ballots had check-marked entries that were PRINTED and not manually written by a voter. It is entirely possible however, that entire rooms of Chinese children could've done nothing but enter check marks on fraudulent ballots printed in China before being shipped over here to shadowy DNC operatives such as BLM.

I'll bet BLM'er poll workers were paid HUGE $$$ by the Mark Zucky to STEAL the election. This is why the coward HIDES in his huge walled-off Hawaii compound.

[grey_whiskers]