Posted on 05/04/2021 8:17:59 AM PDT by Signalman
Don’t be stupid. East Virginia Medical School’s covid treatment protocols include IVM. They have recently joined FLCCC re. covid treatment protocols.
Everyone should read these protocols because they work.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
One of the most evil things I’ve seen in my lifetime is the blacklisting of covid treatments that work by the political and media elites. That evil should not appear here on FR.
https://c19early.com/
https://c19legacy.com/
Read post 21
Too bad the political doctors wouldn’t give him the HCQ course or the Ivermectin course...
The study did not use the “best use” protocol for Ivermectin Therapy and Hydroxichloroquin based therapy. They did not use i\the therapy with Zinc, within the first 10 days of the infection.
Since them Dr.Pierre Corey has stipulated its proper use:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VQcKdP7BQc
Ivermectin protocol is being used by thousands of front line health workers as prophylaxis:
*************************************************
FRONT LINE COVID-19 CRITICAL CARE ALLIANCE PROPHYLAXIS & TREATMENT PROTOCOLS FOR COVID-19 PROPHYLAXIS PROTOCOL lvermectin Prophylaxis for high risk individuals
0.2 mg/kg * — one dose on day 1 and day 3, then take one dose weekly for 10 weeks, followed by one dose every 2 weeks** Post COVID-19 exposure prophylaxis *** 0.2 mg/kg * — one dose on day 1 and day 3 Vitamin D3 1,000–3,000 IU/day Vitamin C 1,000 mg twice a day Quercetin 250 mg/day Zinc 50 mg/day Melatonin 6 mg before bedtime (causes drowsiness) EARLY OUTPATIENT PROTOCOL
**** lvermectin 0.2 mg/kg * — one dose on day 1 and day 3 Vitamin D3 4,000 IU/day Vitamin C 2,000 mg 2–3 times daily Quercetin 250 mg twice a day Zinc 1 0 0 m g/d ay Melatonin 10 mg before bedtime (causes drowsiness) Aspirin 325 mg/day (unless contraindicated) * ≈ 0.09 mg/lb per dose (take on an empty stomach with water). Example for a per - son of 60 kg (body weight): 60 kg × 0.2 mg = 12 mg — please see conversion table (kg lbs) on page 2 to calculate the appropriate ivermectin dose. ** This dosing may be updated as further scientific studies emerge. *** To use if a household member is COVID-19 positive, or you have prolonged exposure to a COVID-19 positive patient without wearing a mask **** For late phase — hospitalized patients — see the FLCCC’s MATH+ Hospital Treat ment Protocol for COVID-19 on www.flccc.n
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-I-MASK-Protocol-v4-2020-11-22.pdf
Ahhh censorship. The last bastion of the desperate. Of course I know personally that these medications don’t work. So there is always that whole clinical experience thing.
Read Post 24
I have no doubt that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are good anti-virals. However, if your immune system has been compromised by a vaccine, rendering you vulnerable through immunopathology, nothing will help your vulnerability. Did you read the study?
Ivermectin and HCq are not cures and could not have saved him. But thanks for the continued propaganda that puts people at risk.
“DITGS”
Do keep in mind that those doing the work on ivermectin are real MDs with real names.
While I assume you are some kind of Dr., you are also an anonymous internet person who claims to be a doctor. Are you? Shoot if I know. You seem a nice guy...
But in choosing between doctors stepping forth with real identification vs. someone who is anonymous and claims to be a Dr., it seems wise to give credence to the verifiable Drs with verifiable credentials...
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
This study makes no predictions.
This study and others like it suggest that the nucleocapsid antigen is the most likely trigger for potential problems with immune response. Further, this study in particular specifically suggests targeting the S protein by itself:
“In this regard, animal model studies with FIPV in cats and RSV in mice have indicated that viral surface proteins may be the sensitizing protein of inactivated vaccines for immunopathology with infection. This suggests that presentation of the S protein in a vector format may direct immune responses in a different way so that sensitization does not occur.”
This was one of the reasons Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, Novavax, and others chose to target the S protein specifically.
In other words, the vaccines we’re using today in the US do exactly what the study you link suggests is the safest path. So you should be happy about that.
After the inflammatory responses to vaccine doses caused a replication of Covid symptoms in some people it seemed this was an indication that the inflammatory response to Covid infection was the major mechanism of Covid symptioms and severe Covid-induced disease. That's clearly not the case. Direct viral effects AND immune/inflammatory responses to Covid can both kill you - and which of these is responsible can vary from patient to patient.
If administered, the Ivermectin protocol would have had an effect. Especially if given with the proper sister medications in large dosage.Better than doing nothing.
But I guess we all should just shrug and kiss our lives goodbye f we have been vaccinated?
I will start digging my own grave this afternoon, buy a new shovel, ........
I’m curious about the Salk study indicating possibility that COVID19 is a blood / vascular disease.
NO ONE in their right medical mind should have given a person with CLL a covid vaccination.
Period.
And to give another Pfizer vaccination 3 weeks later was criminal.
People with CLL do NOT have an immune system that can withstand this kind of attack whether they are in remission or not!
A those in the regime THREATENING no travel without these unapproved vaccinations are guilty of murdering this poor gentleman.
Threatening people with NO PRIVILEGES unless they get these vaccinations is CRIMINAL.
“Of course I know personally that these medications don’t work.”
Why then you should go straighten out the East Virginia Medical School and the FLCCC!
Here’s links, have at it!
https://www.evms.edu/covid-19/covid_care_for_clinicians/
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
Rather bizarre statement as are the Freepvaxxers on here who attack relentlessly anyone who speaks against or questions the jab. So it comes down to what will kill someone statistically as we take into account our own health situation. "safe and effective" is not one size fits all. The Freeper gets the shot and says what's the problem trust the science as another Freeper has problems such as a compromised immune system where science has little data.
Run for your lives!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.